tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6277984098153355193.post3000703075454706111..comments2023-10-26T10:01:59.428-05:00Comments on Bioethics: Philhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02115141650963300011noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6277984098153355193.post-38504829339747213432013-02-27T08:48:20.966-06:002013-02-27T08:48:20.966-06:00Finally got to watch Doc Goldacre's talk. I...Finally got to watch Doc Goldacre's talk. I'm very surprised at how selective publishing can be. I understand that, in general, companies want to have good results for their medications so that they can sell their product, but even if publications don't publish the negative results, they still occur; the product is still flawed. The biggest issue to me is that this kind of practice doesn't not allow for continued preservance in searching for a better performing product (medication, procedure, etc.). Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16045429756417693122noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6277984098153355193.post-81393732151038952942013-02-25T13:27:05.493-06:002013-02-25T13:27:05.493-06:00This is interesting and really quite alarming! I n...This is interesting and really quite alarming! I never really thought about this type of bias being shown in research. I guess it seems like often times we assume that all the results that we need to be aware of are made known to us but that doesn't seem to be the case.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16216553311657316702noreply@blogger.com