Recently, I attended the AAFS annual meeting in Las Vegas, which
led to possible research projects among other things. With interest in a
research project involving the use of dead swine, I began training in IACUC
standards, the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee which covers the
USDA regulations and a host of other related standards and guides in the use of
animals in research or teaching. I'm still going through a plethora of training
but can clearly see the relation of this to bioethics.
One of my greatest concerns in the
research I wish to pursue is the use of swine which must be euthanized for the
particular forensic research in question. The research is sound and certainly
important to forensics, but I have a great respect for animals and causing them
harm or distress concerned me. Killing an animal for research at all concerns
me, but if I must, I wanted to hope that it could be as painless and swift as
humanly possible. To my great relief, the standards set out by the ethical
boards and committees ensure just that. They ensure that all animals that are
involved are actually required or replaced if they can be by the least sentient
form of life required and the minimal number of said life forms required for
the research. The pain and distress of animals involved in research is taken
very seriously, which also set my mind at ease. There are strict standards and
assessments to ensure this. Everything goes before a board for approval,
sometimes multiple boards, depending upon the research and exactly what you are
proposing to do. This helps to ensure that animals are cared for properly and
that their use is taken very seriously. As I continue my lessons, I find my
concerns further alleviated daily and am very grateful for the ethical boards
and reviews in place. Their presence in the research allows me to plan to
continue forward with this research knowing that someone will be watching over
my shoulder to help ensure that I can do this without traumatizing myself or
the animals I have to use, as I can assure you that traumatizing the animals
would most certainly traumatize me as well.
Aristotle said that "Educating the
mind without educating the heart is no education at all". I agree with
this statement wholeheartedly. I am very passionate about respecting life in
all forms and always have been. I raised my children in this way and will
proudly state, even punished them for harming trees or plant life if they had
no good, firm reason for having done so. These core beliefs made going into any
science or medical related field very challenging for me, as I knew that
research would lay in the path to my goals. There is no replacement yet for the
"physical doing" of science when it comes to research, dissections
and eventually, autopsies in learning. This is my Achilles heel or krypton in
science, the use of living organisms including their possible harm and death. I
will admit that I have less of an issue with parasites and insects, though they
are living. It is not that I wish them to die so much as that I wish them to
simply not exist anymore or at least, not near me.
Aristotle also said “I count him braver who overcomes his desires
than him who conquers his enemies, for the hardest victory is over self”. I
realize that we have not been studying Aristotle so much this semester, but he
is by far my favorite philosopher and I find his thinking most in line with
mine on these topics. I think that this quote speaks a great deal about why we need
ethical boards and committees in place for research. We can become preoccupied
by our research and our goals very easily, especially if it leads to a “great
good” and can easily be led to believe that the greater good might overshadow
the pain of a few but that would be a great mistake. I find myself often swayed
by this line of thinking in many things but can always count on Aristotle to
remind me that what is in my heart and soul is of great importance too. I am
very grateful that a number of boards and committees are in place that
understand that desire must sometimes take a back seat and that someone must
ensure that we “conquer ourselves” in our quest for knowledge. I, for one, will
rest easier at night in this knowledge as I continue to pursue my degree.
Hope the model that can totally replace animal testing can be developed and taken into practice more quickly as I recently read a paper about a project "mini brain", which is of the basic characters of brains and can be used as a substitution of animal brains. It may be possible to use human tissue bank to achieve the same effect.
ReplyDeleteThat would be amazing! I'll read up on it.
Delete