Two more models
of analysis discussed within Clone Being:
Exploring the Psychological and Social Dimensions were the Parent-Child Resemblances
Model and The Child of the Famous Model. These models for Cloning look at the
individual donating the genetic material having a generational gap between
themselves and the clone. This concept
of differences in age between the clone the originator of the genetic material,
results in unique dynamics that was not accounted for with the Identical Twin
model discussed previously. Another unique dynamic to these models is that they
consider the fact the originator shares genetic material with the clone,
something that the Adoption Model could not consider by itself. The first of these, the Parent-Child Model,
is probably the most comparable to traditional raising of offspring.
The
Parent-Child Model looks at the clone not as an equal, like the Identical twin
model, but as a genetically identical offspring to the originator of the genetic
material. As such, there are several dynamics that are comparable to the
Adoption Model, like the differences in generation of the originator of the
genetic material and the clone. However, the main differences between the
Parent-Child Resemblance Model and the Adoption model is that the clone looks
like the originator of the genetic material. As such there are unique dynamics,
such as the attraction to an offspring that looks like an individual, and
several sections on the possibility of narcissistic parenting and the dangers possessed
with such parenting styles, that are considered which distinguish the Parent-Child
model from other models discussed. While these concepts are vital to
understanding how a normal individual might handle having a cloned offspring,
the situation can be dramatically different of the originator of the genetic
material is a public figure or a celebrity.
The
Child of the Famous Model looks at the possible psychological and sociological
implications of a famous, or infamous, individual cloning themselves. One possibility
discussed was the concept of the famous individual donating or selling his
genetic material so that individuals can have an offspring that is genetically
identical to a celebrity or public figure. This would result in a situation where
the clone would be indirectly famous because of the originator of the genetic
material’s fame and public image. Another concept discussed was the clone’s
view of the donor of the genetic material, knowing as much about the famous
individual as the public and romanticizing the relationship between the clone
and celebrity. Also discussed was the concept that even if the cloned was
raised by the original genetic donor, the relationship would be strained due to
the fame of the original genetic donor, as seen with celebrity children today. Another
concept discussed involved the additional social pressures a clone of a famous
individual would face from society, which could manifest in several mental disorders
for the clone. Lastly the concept of the clone replacing the original famed
individual after their death or retirement was discussed, bringing to light the
idea of the clone continuing the legacy of the famed individual.
In conclusions, both the
Parent-Child Model and the Child of the Famous Model both bring unique
psychological a sociological considerations to light. While one model focuses
on how cloning could affect the normal, parent-child relationship, the other model focuses on how cloning could affect relationships between celebrities, their
clones, and the public at large. These are just a few of the possible outcomes
that could result if cloning becomes common placed.
Word count: 575
I feel ethically you run into a ton of problems if they are cloned to continue the legacy of someone. This is because what if they did not want to do what the original did with their life. Then you seem to be taking away the freewill of the clone which would be preposterous. A clone would still be human and if it was fully functioning human.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete