Medical Conscience
Medical conscience advocates that
medical professionals can refuse to perform a service for a patient when it
goes against their moral belief unless the patient’s life is at stake. Since,
the Roe v. Wade verdict many conscience laws have been enacted. Starting with providing
abortion-related exemptions to healthcare professionals if abortion or
sterilization services go against their religious or moral beliefs. Some states
have also enacted “right of refusal” laws for pharmacists allowing them to
refuse to fill a prescription that goes against their religious or moral
beliefs, such as, birth control or plan B. Many of the conscience laws deal
with abortion, sterilization, and stem cell treatments, but with the
ever-changing healthcare system and advancements in medicine these laws will
continue to expand.
While a medical professional can
refuse to participate in a procedure that goes against their religious or moral
beliefs that professional still has a duty to ensure the care of the patient.
Therefore, if a medical professional refuses to provide a service then they are
obligated to allow that patient to seek medical care elsewhere without
interference; refusing to give a referral, stepping between the patient and
another doctor, or making a patient feel uncomfortable or ashamed goes against
the patient’s right to care.
While healthcare workers should
have the right to be exempted from services or procedures they do not believe
in the right of the patient to have access to care also needs to be taken into
consideration. Some laws, such as, “right of refusal” for pharmacist conflict
with other laws; when a pharmacist refuses to fill birth control or emergency
contraception it interferes with a person’s right to privacy because she is
denied the right to decide to use contraception. It also can be seen as unequal
treatment of men and women. Another consideration to be taken is access to
care; for low-income or rural areas if a professional refuses to provide a
service, let’s say an abortion, then that patient may have no other way to receive
care in the area. Though a procedure may go against a healthcare workers
morality, can that same person also say it is moral to leave a patient with no
access to care?
Medical
conscience is good for healthcare professionals because it allows them to keep
their morality while providing care to patients. But we also have to consider
that there may be instances where these laws hinder a patient’s right to care. And
those healthcare professionals may have to put aside their reservations for a
procedure if there is no other way for a patient to receive care they need.
Right: providers' conscience and patients' rights must always be negotiated and balanced in a Hippocratically-defensible manner. You've stated the issue exactly correctly, in my view.
ReplyDelete