Up@dawn 2.0

Saturday, March 9, 2013

The debate on menstruation cycles- Rebekah Schott



The debate on menstruation cycles

CAUTION: Boys, this blog does contain information about the menstruation cycle and may contain disturbing discussions. Be prepared I guess.

My aim is to inform you of various facts and studies pertaining to the menstrual cycle. I will offer both sides of the debate and add my own comments on how it affects me and the other girls that surround me.

So, what exactly is menstruation? 

I would describe it as that horrible thing that happens to me once, maybe twice a month, makes me terribly rude, makes my boyfriend steer clear of me for an entire week, makes me crave food, have terrible migraines, eat large amounts of candy/chocolate, gain lots of weight, feel bloated and uncomfortable, and completely controls my life.  

However, Dr. Phillip Owen, obstetrician and gynecologist, says “Menstruation - having periods - is part of the female reproductive cycle that starts when girls become sexually mature at the time of puberty. During a menstrual period, a woman bleeds from her uterus (womb) via the vagina. This lasts anything from three to seven days. Each period commences approximately every 28 days if the woman does not become pregnant during a given cycle. “

An objective view.

Why do women menstruate?

Dr. Phillip Owen says,
“Menstruation is a natural process that occurs if an egg is not fertilized. If the egg is fertilized and the woman becomes pregnant, it will fasten itself onto the endometrium, build up of blood. If the egg is not fertilized, however, resultant hormonal changes cause the endometrium to slip away and menstruation begins. Menstrual discharge is composed of the endometrium itself, together with a little fresh blood caused by the breaking of very fine blood vessels within the endometrium as it detaches itself from the inside of the uterus."

"The amount of blood lost due to the normal monthly period is usually less than 80ml. “

80ml is approximately 1/3 a cup. Haha. Who are you kidding? This seems a very low estimate. Many woman I know take iron replacements because they lose so much blood.

So, what are you getting at?

A birth control pill released in 2007, Lybrel, suppresses women’s monthly menstrual cycle for a year.  Some women welcome the pill with open arms, while others feel for various reasons that it should not be taken. A lot of critics think that the menstrual cycle is natural and should not be eliminated. 

“My concern is that the menstrual cycle is an outward sign of something that’s going on hormonally in the body,” said Christine L. Hitchcock, a researcher at the University of British Columbia. Ms. Hitchcock said she worries about “the idea that you can turn your body on and off like a tap.” 

Some women and doctors share this concern; however, there are no studies that suggest this. Doctors say they know of no medical reasons why women taking birth control pills should have a period. studies have found no extra health risks associated with pills that stop menstruation, although some doctors caution that little research has been conducted on long-term effects.
Something a lot of advocates don’t know, is that the bleeding you experience on birth control pills is not a real period. When birth control pills first hit the market in the 1960s, women generally took three weeks of active contraceptive pills followed by one week of placebos or no pills. The thinking was that women would find this more acceptable, that they would feel like they were having their normal menses," says Susan Ernst, M.D., chief of gynecology services for the University Health Service at the University of Michigan and clinical instructor in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the U-M Health System. And now many gynecologists are saying the “withdraw bleeding” that following the three weeks of pills and mimics a normal menstrual cycle is no longer necessary. 

In fact, the practice of suppressing a menstrual period has been going on a long time. Some women never take the placebo pill the fourth week of the month where their withdraw bleeding should occur, and just continue a new packet of birth control pills.
Various methods are described in the table below.









Method
Use
Combined oral contraceptives (including dedicated product Seasonale® and LybrelTM)
Extended or continuous cycles suppress menstruation
Contraceptive vaginal ring (NuvaRing®)
Studies not published, but regimens similar to COCs suppress menstruation
Transdermal contraceptive patch (Ortho Evra®)
Studies not published about safety or efficacy, but regimens similar to COCs suppress menstruation
Depot-medroxyprogesterone actetate injections (Depo-Provera®)
Amenorrhea common with long-term use—50% after 1 year, 90% after 2 years
Levonorgestrel intrauterine system (Mirena®)
Significant (80%–90%) decrease in blood loss; approximately 20% of users amenorrheic by 1 year


The topic has inspired a documentary by Giovanna Chesler, “Period: The End of Menstruation?,” currently screening on college campuses and among feminist groups. Below is a link for a trailer of the documentary.


Pill That Eliminates the Period Gets Mixed Reviews
Ruth Fremson/The New York Times
An audience watching an hourlong documentary film by Giovanna Chesler, “Period: The End of Menstruation?,” at the Bluestockings Bookstore on Allen Street in Manhattan recently.


“We don’t have any long-term studies for what happens if you stop periods for years and years and years,” said Dr. Maria Bustillo, a reproductive endocrinologist in Miami. Dr. Bustillo said there was probably no increased risk over traditional birth control regimens. Although studies are conflicting, some have shown that the birth control pill may increase that risk. 

If we are so scared of the risks of suppressing the menstrual cycle, why are there not more studies that solidify the facts?

With Barr’s Seasonale and Seasonique, the biggest medical problem is that users can have unpredictable and irregular bleeding or “spotting."

To me, spotting is a huge upgrade from a constant flow.

Menstrual suppression may be particularly appealing to women who suffer severe pain, heavy bleeding or emotional problems during their periods. A study by Canadian researchers found that women afflicted by heavy menstrual bleeding give up $1,692 a year in lost wages. Women often feel less effective at work and school during their periods. They limit sexual activity and exercise; wear dark clothes and stay home more. One woman who now uses Seasonale said she had found her periods debilitating before she started taking it. 

“I had some months when I couldn’t get out of bed unless I popped 600 milligrams of Motrin,” said Marcella O’Neal, a department manager for Nordstrom in Atlanta. Ms. O’Neal, 36, said Seasonale had eliminated many of her symptoms — cramping, hot flashes and depression. “I love it, actually,” she said. 

Menstrual benefits of suppressing periods include a reduction in dysmenorrhea, menorrhagia, premenstrual syndrome, and perimenopausal symptoms such as hot flashes, night sweats, and irregular monthly periods.

Nonmenstrual benefits include a reduction in menstrual migraines, endometriosis, breast tenderness, bloating, menstrual migraine, and premenstrual syndrome or premenstrual dysphoric disorder, as well as medical conditions such as endometriosis and acne, and an improved sense of well-being.

One who attended the screening of “Period: The End of Menstruation?,” Aviva Bergman, a 22-year-old student at Goucher College in Maryland, said she would not use products that suppressed her period because it seemed unnatural.“I just feel that there’s a reason you’re getting it every month,” she said.

I think it is fine if you don’t want to use the product, however, not every woman feels this way and I think it is our right as woman to have this option. I also understand a lot of the critics are scared of what the affects of suppressing your period may do, however, there should be more studies conducted to find out facts, not just bad feelings. To women who suffer severe pain, heavy bleeding or emotional problems during their periods, the idea that these side-effects can  be eliminated in woman that find themselves “debilitated” during their menstrual cycle seems amazing.

Friday, March 8, 2013

Nano tech midterm post two


For my second midterm project post I want to highlight some of the ways that nanotechnology is being applied in the field of medicine. I have found a few articles that show nano tech being used to improve the health of people in many different circumstances.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/01/110118092140.htm

This first link has to do with regrowing human organs, specifically the skin. This article shows how scientists using nano technology have been fabricating synthetic polymeric structures on which they can grow organs. I found this particularly interesting because I have always thought that stem cell research was a fascinating, yet confusing subject.
I understood that stem cells copy surrounding cells, but I had never understood how this translated into the creation of an organ with a definite structure and shape.
It seems that through creating nano structures with this polymer, scientists are able to guide stem cells not only into becoming say a heart cell, but also into the shape and structure of a heart. Currently, they have been most successful with skin, but since new developments have made their equipment five times more accurate they have hopes of progressing even farther soon.

http://www.technologyreview.com/news/427821/fine-tuning-nanotech-to-target-cancer/

The above page shows a model of a nano tech cell designed by MIT to fight cancer. Cancer is a terrible disease for many reasons and one of those is that treatments for cancer (like chemo) can damage cancerous and healthy parts of the body at the same time. Well this article shows that people are working on ways to stop that.
Researchers at MIT are working on a nano tech based delivery system for a cancer treating drug that will minimize damage to healthy organs. The other benefit of this treatment is that the drug stays in the body longer, which means patients may spend less time in the hospital.
I hope you enjoyed these uses of nano tech and if there are any comments I would love to hear your opinions.

Religiosity of Medicine (Heather Davis)

Here's a link to Heather's blog, also linked in the right margin under "Bioethics Links"... & an excerpt from Part 1:
Should we or not lengthen life through artificial means?Is it acceptable to shorten life or dull the exposure of life through the use of pain medications? What is the expanse on how far a person can go to render a disease? This is but a fraction of the myriad of questions that have religious and spiritual significance to a large host of our society. These decisions deserve a sensitive yet direct approach. How can one's faith be taken into account if it is not acknowledged? And at what point does a professional know that faith is playing a role in the patients decision?

Thursday, March 7, 2013

Women in the military- new movie

THIS MOVIE IS AWESOME! 
if you have netflix... its on there.
but here is the website promoting the movie/documentary:
http://invisiblewarmovie.com/
you can sign the petition too... (on the website).
thanks all! Cas

Wednesday, March 6, 2013

Philosophy Lyceum & Baseball Conference


Kelly A. Parker

Professor of philosophy, environmental studies, and liberal studies at
Grand Valley State University

What Ought We to Sustain?
A Pragmatic Framework for the Question

Friday, March 22, 2013
JUB 304
Flyer for Kelly Parker's talk

=====================
=====================

Agenda for 18th Annual Conference

Baseball in Literature and Culture*
April 5, 2013

7:45-8:15        Registration and Breakfast

8:15-8:30        Welcome         Warren Tormey, Conference Coordinator
                                                Dr. Brad Bartel, University Provost

8:30-9:15        Keynote Address: Dr. Andrew Hazucha, Ottawa University
                        “A Jim Bouton Retrospective:  Zen and the Politics of the Kuckleball”                                     
                                   
9:20-10:20         Concurrent Sessions A

Session A1:     “Negro League Contexts”

Location: Hazlewood                                    Chair:   

Stephanie Liscio, (Need affiliation):  “Race and Baseball in Cleveland”

Will Boone, Winston-Salem State University:  “Black Babe Ruths:  Major League Baseball, Hip Hop Icons, and the Birth of the Uncool”

Dan Anderson, Dominican Univ., “’Sensational War of Words’:  Cultural Ideals, the African-American Press, and the Formation of the Negro Leagues”

Session A2:     “Baseball as Muse”

Location:  Dining Rm. C                              Chair: 

David Cicotello, Murfreesboro TN:  “New Developments in McFarland’s Historical Ballparks Series

Mark Sickman, Baseballbard.com:  “Caught in a Run-Down:  The Perilous Position of an Online Poetry Publisher”

Brian Steverson, Knoxville TN:  “Negro League Baseball in Verse”

Session A3:  “19th Century Baseball”

Location:  Faculty Senate Chambers          Chair:

Bob Barrier, Kennesaw State:  “’The Great Match’ and ‘Our Baseball Club’:  Two Early Baseball Novels”
Josh Howard, Middle Tennessee State University:  “Amateur Baseball in Alleghany County, VA, During the Late-Nineteenth Century”

Warren Tormey, Middle Tennessee State University:  “August 23rd, 1860:  The Day Baseball Fell”

10:30-11:30       Concurrent Sessions B


Session B1:  “Baseball and Locality”

Location:  Hazlewood                                   Chair:   

Amanda Bales, Lincoln University:  “Why I Want The Cubs to Win the World Series”

Michael Pagel, Northeastern State CC:  “William Heuman’s ‘Brooklyns Lose’ (1954):  Dodges Tragedy with the Goodwill of Neighbors”

Bill Gruber, Emory University:  “Jocks, Herbs, and the 1936 Yankees”

Session B2:  “Baseball in Film and TV”

Location:  Dining Rm. C                              Chair: 

Ginger Stelle, Morthland College:  “’E.T. Steal Home’:  Baseball on Star Trek:  Deep Space Nine and The X-Files

Nick Bush, Motlow State CC:  “’Mookie Wilson.  That’s a Thing, Right?’—Pitching, Parody, and Perfection in How I Met Your Mother’s ‘Perfect Week’ Episode”

Ron Briley, Sandia Prep.:  “A New Beginning for the Baseball Film Genre:   Bang the Drum Slowly (1974)”

Session B3:  “Seeing Stars:  Baseball Heroes”

Location:  Faculty Senate Chambers          Chair:

Stephen Andrews, Grinnell College:  “On Leanne Howe’s Miko Kings:  An Indian Baseball Story

R Dean Johnson, Eastern Kentucky University:  “All-Star Treatment”

Gina Logue, Middle Tennessee State University:  “Hank Aaron:  My Childhood Hero” 




11:40-12:05       Concurrent Sessions C

Session C1:  “Sports Business”

Location:  Hazlewood                                   Chair:

Don Roy,  Middle Tennessee State University:  “MLBAM:  ‘Trampling Snow’ to Bridge America’s Pastime and the Digital Future”

Session C2:  “Creative Fiction I”

Location:  Dining Rm. C                              Chair:

Craig Albin, Missouri State University:  “Judgment Call”:  A Short Story

Session C3:  “Winding Up…”

Location:  Faculty Senate Chambers          Chair:

Crosby Hunt, Middle Tennessee State University:  “Something on Ball Four


12:15-2:00 Luncheon and Jim Bouton Talk
Tennessee Room

12:00-12:45 Lunch
12:45-1:30  Jim Bouton Talk (~20 min. talk + 10 min. Q&A)

Book Signing in James Union Lobby to follow talk

2:00-3:00 Concurrent Sessions D

Session D1: “Hall of Fame Decisions and Other Ethical Matters”

Location:  Hazlewood                                   Chair: 

Sarah Bunting, tomatonation.com:  “Facing Reality (TV):  Pet Rose’s Biggest Obstacle to the Hall Isn’t that He Bet on Baseball”

Ben Morrill, Middle Tennessee State Univeristy:  “The Baseball Hall of Fame’s Influence in the Development of Private Sports Museums and Halls of Fame”

* Phil Oliver, Middle Tennessee State University:  “Right When They’re Wrong:  Fallible Umpires and Infallible Rules”


Session D2:  Baseball Creative Fiction II

Location:  Dining Rm. C                              Chair: 

Thomas Luckie, Butler University:  “Rain Delay”

Steven Walker, Middle Tennessee State University:   “Civil War”

Tuesday, March 5, 2013

Nano Tech: Midterm Blog Post One


For my midterm assignment I plan to look at some of the innovations in the field of nanotechnology. I feel that genetic engineering and nanotechnology represents the future of the human race. As we evolve, grow, and expand, we face certain problems. These include disease, a lack of resources, and the desire to improve our general quality of living. I believe that these problems can be solved by developments in nano tech and genetic engineering. By reviewing some articles in favor of nano tech and some arguing against it I will show how this field is the future of our evolution. I also hope that anyone who has interest in the subject or disagrees will post in response to my midterm project.

The first subject that I want to address is food. We are dependent on food that requires a large amount of land to be cultivated. It is apparent that Earth's population is always on the rise. In order to meet our demand for food and avoid starvation, we will either have to create more areas for agriculture or we will have to engineer better food. As land mass on Earth is finite and deforestation is already a problem, I think that the obvious choice is to create better food.

http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/02/24/top-10-uses-of-nanotechnology-in-food/

The link above lists some of the ways that nano tech can improve our food. These improvements include more potent vitamins, longer lasting food, and less risk of bacteria like E. coli. There is also a way to block certain censors in our taste buds so that food can produce the tastes we enjoy. I know that this sounds like it could be dangerous, but it is based on a plant that does this naturally. A plant that has a very low sugar content can be altered to release a chemical that blocks the bitter sensors in your tongue, so that it will taste sweet.

http://nano.foe.org.au/node/198

Above is an article that claims that nano tech in our food supply is a threat to our health. The argument this writer supplies is that the science is new, unregulated and that packages do not warn customers of the use of nano tech. These are reasonable arguments, but I would have to argue that any new science posses a threat to someones health. The answer to this is to perfect the science, not to ban it. Furthermore, if people are experimenting with nano tech on food and not going through the FDA then they should be corrected, but I have found that this is not usually the case. Finally this writer argues that organic foods are a viable alternative to foods altered by science. I disagree, many people can not afford these foods. Also many people live in areas where organic foods are not readily available. Even if we were to expand organic farming, it is unlikely that the farm land could support our global population (and if it could, for how long?). We would eventually find ourselves in a situation where altered food became necessary and then the technology would be rushed, which would be more dangerous.

This is my first installment in my nano tech research. I will post more this week.
-Patrick Mcsweeney

Monday, March 4, 2013

Young Child "cured" of HIV infection: first of its kind.


Read the article HIV Patient about a young pediatric patient who was miraculously able to fight off HIV using only antiviral medication.  Leading scientists on the report make note that this is a perfect opportunity, and reason, to explore more differences in the immunity of young individuals compared to adults.  I hope discoveries of this sort get you as excited as they do me.

Mental Illness and Stigmas

Sherwin Nuland - How Electroshock Changed Me

I'm writing this from my iPad and can't quite figure out how to embed. The above link will open in a new window so we don't have to worry about redirection from the blog.  I would like to discuss some issues regarding mental health, both in treatment and in social stigma. I think that Dr. Nuland is a great place to start with this type of discussion.  Dr. Nuland was a well known surgeon in New Haven who struggled with crippling depression.  Because of his ECT he was able to overcome his illness, regain his position as a renowned surgeon, all while keeping his troubled relatively secret.  He is now a successful author and public speaker.

We've discussed in my physiology class how antidepressants can alter memory formation and may have long term complications when used in developing teens. Of course, ECT can also result in awful complications for those that does not help.  A question with mental health treatment that often is asked would be is it the right time to being treatment? Should we allow the patient to struggle in hopes that they will simply work through it?  I just wanted to introduce some of these discussions to begin thinking of discussion routes for my presentation.

Some other discussions of mental illness, including ECT discussions -

Battling Bipolar Disorder - NPR interview

Risks and Benefits of ECT - Talk of the Nation

Obliged to life

No new Bioethics cases from Glenn McGee today, we’re patiently working our way through midterm report presentations. (Joshua first, then Andrew, Cassie,...) Good opportunity to step back and ponder larger questions. Life. The Universe. Everything.

Well, what about life? What obliges us to preserve, protect, and defend it?

Komron’s report on physician-assisted suicide muddies the question. It seems the very least  a conscientious healer can do for some patients, in loyalty to life, is help them terminate an untenable and intolerable existence. Not to help, in those toughest cases, is to harm.

What’s wrong with misanthropy? Isn’t it the most rational stance, given our history? Why shouldn’t we notice and deplore and finally renounce all the collective harm we do to our planet and other species, and decide (with Vincent) that we  really ought to pull the plug on ourselves?

Continues at Up@dawn | reflections caught at daybreak