Arthur R. Jenson, a well-known educational
psychologist is regarded by many as the father of modern academic racism. He
established a belief that intellectual ability was largely determined by
genetic factor and socioeconomic factors had very little to do with it, this
was later recognized as Jensonism. In the Harvard
Educational Review (1969) “How Much Can We Boost IQ and scholastic Achievement?”
he rejected welfare program such as Head Start based on his finding. He explained
that this would be a misplaced fund because ultimately these programs would not
help minorities substantially advance academically. Critics today condemn his
findings as racist while other appreciate his approach to his findings calling
him unafraid. There are critics, such as Professor Detterman, who in 1998 regarded
his work as misunderstood claiming he did not have racist intentions rather he
was taking a step towards a greater discovery that is supported today by many psychologists
that can agree there is a hereditary factor in intelligence. While the debate
continued, a book in response to Jensen’s “Bias in Mental Testing” called “The Cognitive
Basis of Intellect” by Professor Grover (1981) argued that it is possible to create
tests of general intelligence that are removed from “cultural bias”. Lastly,
she points out the severe implications of his findings on links between genetics
and intellectual capacity. They not only shaped the perspective society has on
minority groups, they also diminished the quality of their education. She states
that his apologist overlooks his politically incorrect position to justify his
bravery in science have and because of this have failed to see that “you cannot
social science from human rights”.
Jensen’s approach to Differential Psychology undoubtedly
left an impact on society. He taught as a graduate professor at the University
of California, Berkeley until he passed away October 2012. Psychologist now
agree that your gene expression and environment do impact your brain development,
however when it comes to intellect, environmental input is most impacting. The
IQ exam stemmed out of a scale called Binet-Simon scale. A French psychologist
named Alfred Binet created this scale to identify the students who had learning
disabilities. This scale went through several revisions and ultimately when it
got to the U.S. it was revised by professors in Stanford. It was renamed the Stanford-Binet
scale and while it used to find students with learning disabilities it was also
used to find the students who had above average intelligence. This test, like
many other tests, claim that if you score high you are typically gifted, if you
score low you “often face some sort of cognitive disability”. Jenson came to
his conclusion by having a diverse group take an IQ test and when he noticed that
minority groups were scoring low on conceptual abilities, abstract thinking,
and problem solving as opposed to white people, this became the basis of his
research. Although most professionals denounce his findings, there is an issue
with lower test score in more minority populated schools. While test like the ACT
or SAT don’t count your “intelligence quotient” they do suggest for many if you’ll
be successful in academics and the professional field. This is often discouraging
to many students who face this “achievement gap” and don’t understand
socioeconomic factor behind it.
Works Cited:
https://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/02/science/arthur-r-jensen-who-set-off-debate-on-iq-dies.html
https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/primer/traits/intelligence
https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/individual/arthur-jensen
https://www.famousscientists.org/alfred-binet/
https://www.russellsage.org/sites/default/files/Ayres_BinetSimon%20Test_0.pdf
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2989000/
http://articles.latimes.com/2003/mar/12/local/me-sterile12
I think that what Jenson came across regarding the test scores between different races was accurate, but he attributed the results to the wrong causation. While the lower test scores did correlate with minorities, it was most likely due to their lack of availability to solid education, and was definitely not a racial trait as he predicted. I think that this day in age, it's important that younger minorities have people of their culture to look up to, who have broken the same societal expectations that they are held to in order to try to bridge that "achievement gap."
ReplyDeleteDQ:
ReplyDelete1) Professor Grover makes the claim that social science cannot be separated from human rights, but what are some of the ways we can approach research in social science without causing some sort of ethical breach when we enter uncharted territory. This discussion arises in our most modern discussion of gender identity.
2) Jenson's claim have been proven wrong by the success of Head Start, still do you believe our society should strive to advance the reparations of his and his supporters damages? (I'd like to point out via our readings, when California condemned their practice of forced sterilizations and issued an apology years later, the survivors could do little to hold the government accountable because the Supreme Court had ruled in 1927 the constitutionality of forced sterilizations.)
https://education.cu-portland.edu/blog/news/do-standardized-test-show-an-accurate-view-of-students-abilities/
ReplyDeleteYou might want to read this articles that looks at the arguments against and for standardized testing, might just give an insight.
So much of what we call "intelligence" is really cultural literacy and advantage. Pretty dumb not to realize that!
ReplyDeleteBy cultural literacy I mean this sort of knowlege:
Deletehttps://books.google.com/books?id=rYzraWP9y60C&printsec=frontcover&dq=cultural+literacy+hirsch&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjrpenN7LvgAhUhSN8KHTkhAYIQ6wEIKzAA#v=onepage&q=cultural%20literacy%20hirsch&f=false
I agree, growing up I heard that My friends don’t speak proper English...that they sounded “black”. What they meant was uneducated however and had attributed that trait to a whole group of people.
Delete