Up@dawn 2.0

Thursday, January 20, 2022

Bioethics Coming of Age: a New Mountain to Climb

      In Bioethics: The Basics by Alastair Campbell, he covers the central components of bioethics, demonstrating how vast the field really is.  When I read a book, I notice it usually tends to date itself. I thought this book would be different - however, within the first chapter Campbell talks about bioethics "coming of age," which I thought to be somewhat ironic given the current state of the pandemic.  Like many others, Campbell didn't see the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic coming, nor did he see the bioethical issues it would bring with it.  

    These issues being brought into the public sphere has devalued the study of bioethics.  So many individuals take it for granted that a doctor must do no harm to them, that public health officials must defend the individual's life at the price of their own.  Who is in charge of doing no harm to physicians? Who should take responsibility to protect public health officials being met with a deadly virus?

    The answer is not simple, and these questions do not enumerate the depth of the bioethical issues raised by the pandemic.  Instead of concrete instructions and willful players, our population is met with confusion and a lack of direction.  The responsibility to keep our most vulnerable safe is so widely dispersed, people don't perceive it as their own duty.  Even with the development of several effective vaccines, people are slow to take action to protect their neighbors.  Social loafing is slowly killing Americans, but people continue to believe that someone else will pick up their slack.

    The psychological and sociological studies that will follow this time in our history will be numerous. How could leaders allow their weakest to die and claim it a victory?  What is going to be put into place to protect the healthcare workers that are still fighting against this invisible enemy? What new theory will be taught in gen psych or gen soc classes in universities across the country to explain why this pandemic unfolded the way it did?  Most importantly, how are bioethicists to deal with this swirl of issues in the future?

    As with all issues involving ethics, the resolution will depend on multiple factions of the population, including federal and state leaders, healthcare workers, scientists, historians, sociologists, psychologists, and the every day working person.  This mountain is nowhere near conquered, but what we learn along the way will help us get there; after all, it's the climb that really counts. 

Possibilism



Phil.Oliver@mtsu.edu
👣Solvitur ambulando
💭Sapere aude

Wednesday, January 19, 2022

Unit 731

In the first chapter of Bioethics: The Basics, Campbell mentions how after World War II it became increasingly clear that physicians were not these superior moral beings. Some could commit heinous acts. Though I've studied the Holocaust and World War II a few times during my education, I've never heard of the experiments ran by Japanese scientists on the Chinese. Campbell only mentioned it briefly, but I wanted to learn more. The experiments were carried out by Unit 731. 

"Among the thousands of experiments conducted on prisoners: vivisections without anesthesia; injections of venereal diseases to examine their spread; amputations to study blood loss; removal of other body parts and organs; starvation; and deliberate exposure to freezing temperatures to examine the effects of frostbite (Donovan, 2021)."

Here is a good article if you're interested in learning more: https://history.howstuffworks.com/world-war-ii/unit-731.htm

This not only shows the importance of bioethics but also brings into question accountability. Shouldn't the U.S. have ensured that those responsible were brought to justice? At the very least, they could've not actively helped cover it up. What do you think about the U.S. using the data that was collected in these experiments?


Amazon Prime Delivery Van Signage

 Printed on Amazon delivery van:. "Warning!  Contents May Produce Happiness!"

The Premonition: A Pandemic Story

‘Virtual reality is genuine reality’ so embrace it, says philosopher

David Chalmers seems to welcome the prospect of Zuck's "metaverse," but some of us do indeed "still value sheer physicality." This is a bioethical issue. What is life going to make of itself in our world?

..."If virtual worlds are controlled by corporations, as they seem to be right now, will that lead to potentially dystopian realities where the corporations are controlling everything in our environments? I think there are obvious reasons to worry about that," Chalmers says.

It is unlikely everyone will turn to VR, and some people, Chalmers says, will still value sheer physicality.

"There may be a sense of authenticity in interacting in our original biological form. But it's hard to see why sheer physicality should make the difference between a meaningful life and a meaningless life," he writes. "In the long term, virtual worlds may have most of what is good about the nonvirtual world. Given all the ways in which virtual worlds may surpass the nonvirtual world, life in virtual worlds will often be the right life to choose." 

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/jan/17/virtual-reality-is-genuine-reality-so-embrace-it-says-us-philosopher

How Being Sick Changed My Health Care Views

A chronic illness made me more left-wing and more libertarian at once.

...once you've become part of the American pattern of trying anything, absolutely anything in order to feel better — and found that spirit essential to your own recovery — the idea of medical cost control as a primary policy goal inevitably loses some of its allure, and the American way of medical spending looks a little more defensible. To just try things without counting the cost can absolutely run to excess. But sometimes what seems like waste on the technocrat's ledger is the lifeline that a desperate patient needs. Ross Douthat

We Know the Real Cause of the Crisis in Our Hospitals. It’s Greed.

Nurses would like to set the record straight on the hospital staffing crisis.

We're entering our third year of Covid, and America's nurses — who we celebrated as heroes during the early days of lockdown — are now leaving the bedside. The pandemic arrived with many people having great hope for reform on many fronts, including the nursing industry, but much of that optimism seems to have faded... [video]

To keep patients safe and protect our health care workers, lawmakers could regulate nurse-patient ratios, which California put in place in 2004, with positive results. Similar legislation was proposed and defeated in Massachusetts several years ago (with help from a $25 million "no" campaign funded by the hospital lobby), but it is currently on the table in Illinois and Pennsylvania. These laws could save patient lives and create a more just work environment for a vulnerable generation of nurses, the ones we pledged to honor and protect at the start of the pandemic. nyt

Tuesday, January 18, 2022

Questions Jan 20

What is Bioethics? (Basics 1); Premonition Intro/prologue/1
  1. "Bioethics" just means what?
  2. What 40-year U.S. study denied information and treatment to its subjects?
  3. What did Ivan Ilich warn about in Medical Nemesis?
  4. In what issues has the WHO been very active?
  5. How has Bioethics broadened its horizons?
  6. Bioethics has broken free of what mentality?
  7. With what must the main method of Bioethics be concerned?
  8. Are there any important bioethical issues you think Campbell has neglected to mention in ch.1?
  9. Lewis's previous book asked what question?
  10. What did The Lancet point out about the COVID death rate in the U.S.?
  11. Bob Glass learned what, that he'd had no idea of, in The Great Influenza? Did you know that, before COVID?
  12. How did young Charity Dean cheer herself up?
  13. (More Premonition questions)

Opening Day!

LISTEN. Another semester's Opening Day is upon us. Deja Vu all over again. It's cold out there, as they say day after day in Punxsutawney PA. After so many of them, I (like Phil Connors) should be able to get it right. 

Getting it right is pretty easy, on Opening Day in CoPhiAtheism, and Bioethics. We just talk about who we are and why we're here, and we prepare to ask and address lots and lots of other questions... (continues)

Public philosophy

Since the millennium, there has been a huge increase in the visibility of philosophy, both online and off. There are, of course, books on philosophy, but also numerous popular live events, courses, podcasts, television and radio programmes, and newspaper columns. Philosophy today is as likely to be found on YouTube as it is in a bookshop or library. Just to mention a few examples of freely accessible online public philosophy initiatives: Michael Sandel's 'Justice' course, the BBC's History of Ideas animations, or the many popular philosophy podcasts, including History of Philosophy Without Any Gaps from Peter Adamson, Philosophy Bites from David Edmonds and Nigel Warburton, and the philosophy episodes of the BBC Radio 4 series In Our Time. This complex and heterogeneous phenomenon is generally called 'public philosophy'. It's philosophy done in public rather than behind the doors of seminar or lecture rooms, or in paywalled academic journals... (continues)

https://psyche.co/ideas/what-public-philosophy-is-and-why-we-need-it-more-than-ever

Every 8 Seconds, an American Turns 65. How Do We Care for Everyone?

Ai-jen Poo on the economic potential of a public investment in child care, elder care and paid family leave.

Every day in the United States, more than 10,000 babies are born and 10,000 people turn 65. But America doesn't have anything close to a comprehensive family policy. That means no guaranteed paid family leave, no universal child care or preschool and a patchwork system of elder and disability care that leaves millions without support... (Ezra Klein podcast, continues)

The Pandemic Lessons We Clearly Haven’t Learned

Zeynep Tufekci helps me understand the systems-wide failure on Covid — and how we can prepare for the pandemic's next phase.

I remember thinking, as Covid ravaged the country in December 2020, that at least the holidays the next year would be better. There would be more vaccines, more treatments, more immunity. Instead, we got Omicron and a confusing new phase of the pandemic. What do you do with a variant that is both monstrously more infectious and somewhat milder? What do you say about another year when we didn't have enough tests, enough ventilation or the best guidance on masks? And how do you handle the fracturing politics of a changing pandemic in an exhausted country?

Ezra Klein podcast, continues

Neil deGrasse Tyson on pandemics

How do diseases and information spread? On this episode, Neil deGrasse Tyson and comic co-host Chuck Nice discover the history of pandemics, how social networks impact spread, and the hidden math behind it with sociologist and professor Nicholas Christakis.

Are we doing better with COVID-19 than in previous pandemics? What's the difference between a respiratory pandemic and a plague? You'll learn about the history of plagues throughout human history and what features come with them. Are plagues a feature of humanity? We bring some physics to the field of sociology by looking at wave mechanics within a social network. How do we understand the ways disease– and ideas– spread?

We look at hyperdimensional coordinate systems of information and we'll tell you what it even means. Discover Nicholas's sociology research on social networks. Which algorithm used on a network of people provides the biggest information cascade? We breakdown what we did wrong in this pandemic and what unique challenges COVID-19, as a disease, has given us.

What are the different phases of a pandemic? Do we know when it's going to end? When will things go back to normal? Learn about biological ends to pandemics, which ones we think we're headed towards, and the pandemic math behind it. How will mRNA vaccines change our responses to vaccines going forward? All that, plus, we discuss how to continue to spread science literacy and to keep people looking up!

Star Talk Radio
Listen here: https://startalk-radio.simplecast.com/episodes/social-networks-and-ending-the-pandemic-with-nicholas-christakis

Monday, January 17, 2022

Questions Jan 18

 Welcome to Opening Day 2022!

One of our daily tasks in class is to ask and address relevant questions: textual questions that may appear on exams, and discussion questions we can talk and post about. I'll post some in advance of each class, and we can add to them when we meet. If we use a question you've suggested, you can "take a base" on the scorecard. (Don't worry, I'll explain what that means.)

Since we've not read any assigned texts yet, today's questions are just for discussion -- they won't be on the first exam. But they're good questions to talk and post about.

  • Who are you?
  • Why are you here?
  • What are philosophy and bioethics, and what do they have to do with each other?
  • Do you have a favorite philosopher? A favorite scientist?
  • Do you have a pithy personal philosophy? (Maybe something short like Charlie Brown's sister Sally's?--"No!")
  • What ethical/philosophical issues related to the pandemic occur to you?
  • Your suggestions...
Post your responses to these questions in the comments space under Introductions, below.

Sunday, January 16, 2022

Introductions

 Welcome to Bioethics.

I'm Dr. Oliver, I've been at MTSU for decades now teaching this course and others on Atheism, Environmental Ethics, Enlightenment, Evolution, Happiness, Rationality,... 

My twitter profile identifies me as a peripatetic, a dog person, a baseball fan, and an author. I'm also a dad and a meliorist, among other things. I'll elaborate when we meet.

My initial questions for you: who are you, and why are you here? What's your current understanding of what philosophy is, what bioetics is, and what they might have to do with each other? Do you have a favorite philosopher? A favorite life-scientist? What philosophical/ethical reflections on the pandemic come to mind?

Click on "comments" below and introduce yourself. See you soon.

Dr. Oliver

jpo

AMA statement on Supreme Court opinions on COVID-19 vaccination and testing | American Medical Association

"In the face of a continually evolving COVID-19 pandemic that poses a serious danger to the health of our nation, the Supreme Court today halted one of the most effective tools in the fight against further transmission and death from this aggressive virus. While the American Medical Association (AMA) is pleased by today's opinion allowing the Center for Medicare and Medicaid's (CMS) interim rule requiring COVID-19 vaccines for health care workers to take effect, we are deeply disappointed that the Court blocked the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) emergency temporary standard for COVID-19 vaccination and testing for large businesses from moving forward..."

https://www.ama-assn.org/press-center/press-releases/ama-statement-supreme-court-opinions-covid-19-vaccination-and-testing

Saturday, January 15, 2022

This Is No Way to Be Human - The Atlantic

...we need to be more mindful of what this technology has cost us and the vital importance of direct experiences with nature. And by "cost," I mean what Henry David Thoreau meant in Walden: "The cost of a thing is the amount of what I will call life which is required to be exchanged for it, immediately or in the long run..." Alan Lightman

https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2022/01/machine-garden-natureless-world/621268/

Tuesday, January 11, 2022

Covid Test Misinformation Spikes Along With Spread of Omicron

The added demand for testing and the higher prevalence of breakthrough cases have created an “opportune moment” to exploit.

...Misinformation about Covid-19 tests has spiked across social media in recent weeks, researchers say, as coronavirus cases have surged again worldwide because of the highly infectious Omicron variant.


The burst of misinformation threatens to further stymie public efforts to keep the health crisis under control. Previous spikes in pandemic-related falsehoods focused on the vaccines, masks and the severity of the virus. The falsehoods help undermine best practices for controlling the spread of the coronavirus, health experts say, noting that misinformation remains a key factor in vaccine hesitancy...

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/10/technology/covid-test-misinformation.html?smid=em-share

Sunday, January 9, 2022

The C.D.C. Is Hoping You’ll Figure Covid Out on Your Own

…The job these officials have is tough, given both the reckless political opposition even to vaccines and the inevitable criticism even from people who support public health measures. Still, it's so disappointing to enter 2022 with 2020 vibes, scouring for supplies, trying to make sense of official declarations that don't cohere, and wondering what to do.

The government can help us pull out of this fog, but it should always be based on being honest with the public. We aren't expecting officials to have crystal balls about everything, but we want them to empower and inform us while preparing for eventualities — good or bad. Two years is too long to still be hoping for luck to get through all this.


https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/05/opinion/omicron-covid-testing-cdc.html?referringSource=articleShare