Up@dawn 2.0

Saturday, March 9, 2013

The debate on menstruation cycles- Rebekah Schott



The debate on menstruation cycles

CAUTION: Boys, this blog does contain information about the menstruation cycle and may contain disturbing discussions. Be prepared I guess.

My aim is to inform you of various facts and studies pertaining to the menstrual cycle. I will offer both sides of the debate and add my own comments on how it affects me and the other girls that surround me.

So, what exactly is menstruation? 

I would describe it as that horrible thing that happens to me once, maybe twice a month, makes me terribly rude, makes my boyfriend steer clear of me for an entire week, makes me crave food, have terrible migraines, eat large amounts of candy/chocolate, gain lots of weight, feel bloated and uncomfortable, and completely controls my life.  

However, Dr. Phillip Owen, obstetrician and gynecologist, says “Menstruation - having periods - is part of the female reproductive cycle that starts when girls become sexually mature at the time of puberty. During a menstrual period, a woman bleeds from her uterus (womb) via the vagina. This lasts anything from three to seven days. Each period commences approximately every 28 days if the woman does not become pregnant during a given cycle. “

An objective view.

Why do women menstruate?

Dr. Phillip Owen says,
“Menstruation is a natural process that occurs if an egg is not fertilized. If the egg is fertilized and the woman becomes pregnant, it will fasten itself onto the endometrium, build up of blood. If the egg is not fertilized, however, resultant hormonal changes cause the endometrium to slip away and menstruation begins. Menstrual discharge is composed of the endometrium itself, together with a little fresh blood caused by the breaking of very fine blood vessels within the endometrium as it detaches itself from the inside of the uterus."

"The amount of blood lost due to the normal monthly period is usually less than 80ml. “

80ml is approximately 1/3 a cup. Haha. Who are you kidding? This seems a very low estimate. Many woman I know take iron replacements because they lose so much blood.

So, what are you getting at?

A birth control pill released in 2007, Lybrel, suppresses women’s monthly menstrual cycle for a year.  Some women welcome the pill with open arms, while others feel for various reasons that it should not be taken. A lot of critics think that the menstrual cycle is natural and should not be eliminated. 

“My concern is that the menstrual cycle is an outward sign of something that’s going on hormonally in the body,” said Christine L. Hitchcock, a researcher at the University of British Columbia. Ms. Hitchcock said she worries about “the idea that you can turn your body on and off like a tap.” 

Some women and doctors share this concern; however, there are no studies that suggest this. Doctors say they know of no medical reasons why women taking birth control pills should have a period. studies have found no extra health risks associated with pills that stop menstruation, although some doctors caution that little research has been conducted on long-term effects.
Something a lot of advocates don’t know, is that the bleeding you experience on birth control pills is not a real period. When birth control pills first hit the market in the 1960s, women generally took three weeks of active contraceptive pills followed by one week of placebos or no pills. The thinking was that women would find this more acceptable, that they would feel like they were having their normal menses," says Susan Ernst, M.D., chief of gynecology services for the University Health Service at the University of Michigan and clinical instructor in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the U-M Health System. And now many gynecologists are saying the “withdraw bleeding” that following the three weeks of pills and mimics a normal menstrual cycle is no longer necessary. 

In fact, the practice of suppressing a menstrual period has been going on a long time. Some women never take the placebo pill the fourth week of the month where their withdraw bleeding should occur, and just continue a new packet of birth control pills.
Various methods are described in the table below.









Method
Use
Combined oral contraceptives (including dedicated product Seasonale® and LybrelTM)
Extended or continuous cycles suppress menstruation
Contraceptive vaginal ring (NuvaRing®)
Studies not published, but regimens similar to COCs suppress menstruation
Transdermal contraceptive patch (Ortho Evra®)
Studies not published about safety or efficacy, but regimens similar to COCs suppress menstruation
Depot-medroxyprogesterone actetate injections (Depo-Provera®)
Amenorrhea common with long-term use—50% after 1 year, 90% after 2 years
Levonorgestrel intrauterine system (Mirena®)
Significant (80%–90%) decrease in blood loss; approximately 20% of users amenorrheic by 1 year


The topic has inspired a documentary by Giovanna Chesler, “Period: The End of Menstruation?,” currently screening on college campuses and among feminist groups. Below is a link for a trailer of the documentary.


Pill That Eliminates the Period Gets Mixed Reviews
Ruth Fremson/The New York Times
An audience watching an hourlong documentary film by Giovanna Chesler, “Period: The End of Menstruation?,” at the Bluestockings Bookstore on Allen Street in Manhattan recently.


“We don’t have any long-term studies for what happens if you stop periods for years and years and years,” said Dr. Maria Bustillo, a reproductive endocrinologist in Miami. Dr. Bustillo said there was probably no increased risk over traditional birth control regimens. Although studies are conflicting, some have shown that the birth control pill may increase that risk. 

If we are so scared of the risks of suppressing the menstrual cycle, why are there not more studies that solidify the facts?

With Barr’s Seasonale and Seasonique, the biggest medical problem is that users can have unpredictable and irregular bleeding or “spotting."

To me, spotting is a huge upgrade from a constant flow.

Menstrual suppression may be particularly appealing to women who suffer severe pain, heavy bleeding or emotional problems during their periods. A study by Canadian researchers found that women afflicted by heavy menstrual bleeding give up $1,692 a year in lost wages. Women often feel less effective at work and school during their periods. They limit sexual activity and exercise; wear dark clothes and stay home more. One woman who now uses Seasonale said she had found her periods debilitating before she started taking it. 

“I had some months when I couldn’t get out of bed unless I popped 600 milligrams of Motrin,” said Marcella O’Neal, a department manager for Nordstrom in Atlanta. Ms. O’Neal, 36, said Seasonale had eliminated many of her symptoms — cramping, hot flashes and depression. “I love it, actually,” she said. 

Menstrual benefits of suppressing periods include a reduction in dysmenorrhea, menorrhagia, premenstrual syndrome, and perimenopausal symptoms such as hot flashes, night sweats, and irregular monthly periods.

Nonmenstrual benefits include a reduction in menstrual migraines, endometriosis, breast tenderness, bloating, menstrual migraine, and premenstrual syndrome or premenstrual dysphoric disorder, as well as medical conditions such as endometriosis and acne, and an improved sense of well-being.

One who attended the screening of “Period: The End of Menstruation?,” Aviva Bergman, a 22-year-old student at Goucher College in Maryland, said she would not use products that suppressed her period because it seemed unnatural.“I just feel that there’s a reason you’re getting it every month,” she said.

I think it is fine if you don’t want to use the product, however, not every woman feels this way and I think it is our right as woman to have this option. I also understand a lot of the critics are scared of what the affects of suppressing your period may do, however, there should be more studies conducted to find out facts, not just bad feelings. To women who suffer severe pain, heavy bleeding or emotional problems during their periods, the idea that these side-effects can  be eliminated in woman that find themselves “debilitated” during their menstrual cycle seems amazing.

Friday, March 8, 2013

Nano tech midterm post two


For my second midterm project post I want to highlight some of the ways that nanotechnology is being applied in the field of medicine. I have found a few articles that show nano tech being used to improve the health of people in many different circumstances.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/01/110118092140.htm

This first link has to do with regrowing human organs, specifically the skin. This article shows how scientists using nano technology have been fabricating synthetic polymeric structures on which they can grow organs. I found this particularly interesting because I have always thought that stem cell research was a fascinating, yet confusing subject.
I understood that stem cells copy surrounding cells, but I had never understood how this translated into the creation of an organ with a definite structure and shape.
It seems that through creating nano structures with this polymer, scientists are able to guide stem cells not only into becoming say a heart cell, but also into the shape and structure of a heart. Currently, they have been most successful with skin, but since new developments have made their equipment five times more accurate they have hopes of progressing even farther soon.

http://www.technologyreview.com/news/427821/fine-tuning-nanotech-to-target-cancer/

The above page shows a model of a nano tech cell designed by MIT to fight cancer. Cancer is a terrible disease for many reasons and one of those is that treatments for cancer (like chemo) can damage cancerous and healthy parts of the body at the same time. Well this article shows that people are working on ways to stop that.
Researchers at MIT are working on a nano tech based delivery system for a cancer treating drug that will minimize damage to healthy organs. The other benefit of this treatment is that the drug stays in the body longer, which means patients may spend less time in the hospital.
I hope you enjoyed these uses of nano tech and if there are any comments I would love to hear your opinions.

Religiosity of Medicine (Heather Davis)

Here's a link to Heather's blog, also linked in the right margin under "Bioethics Links"... & an excerpt from Part 1:
Should we or not lengthen life through artificial means?Is it acceptable to shorten life or dull the exposure of life through the use of pain medications? What is the expanse on how far a person can go to render a disease? This is but a fraction of the myriad of questions that have religious and spiritual significance to a large host of our society. These decisions deserve a sensitive yet direct approach. How can one's faith be taken into account if it is not acknowledged? And at what point does a professional know that faith is playing a role in the patients decision?

Thursday, March 7, 2013

Women in the military- new movie

THIS MOVIE IS AWESOME! 
if you have netflix... its on there.
but here is the website promoting the movie/documentary:
http://invisiblewarmovie.com/
you can sign the petition too... (on the website).
thanks all! Cas

Wednesday, March 6, 2013

Philosophy Lyceum & Baseball Conference


Kelly A. Parker

Professor of philosophy, environmental studies, and liberal studies at
Grand Valley State University

What Ought We to Sustain?
A Pragmatic Framework for the Question

Friday, March 22, 2013
JUB 304
Flyer for Kelly Parker's talk

=====================
=====================

Agenda for 18th Annual Conference

Baseball in Literature and Culture*
April 5, 2013

7:45-8:15        Registration and Breakfast

8:15-8:30        Welcome         Warren Tormey, Conference Coordinator
                                                Dr. Brad Bartel, University Provost

8:30-9:15        Keynote Address: Dr. Andrew Hazucha, Ottawa University
                        “A Jim Bouton Retrospective:  Zen and the Politics of the Kuckleball”                                     
                                   
9:20-10:20         Concurrent Sessions A

Session A1:     “Negro League Contexts”

Location: Hazlewood                                    Chair:   

Stephanie Liscio, (Need affiliation):  “Race and Baseball in Cleveland”

Will Boone, Winston-Salem State University:  “Black Babe Ruths:  Major League Baseball, Hip Hop Icons, and the Birth of the Uncool”

Dan Anderson, Dominican Univ., “’Sensational War of Words’:  Cultural Ideals, the African-American Press, and the Formation of the Negro Leagues”

Session A2:     “Baseball as Muse”

Location:  Dining Rm. C                              Chair: 

David Cicotello, Murfreesboro TN:  “New Developments in McFarland’s Historical Ballparks Series”

Mark Sickman, Baseballbard.com:  “Caught in a Run-Down:  The Perilous Position of an Online Poetry Publisher”

Brian Steverson, Knoxville TN:  “Negro League Baseball in Verse”

Session A3:  “19th Century Baseball”

Location:  Faculty Senate Chambers          Chair:

Bob Barrier, Kennesaw State:  “’The Great Match’ and ‘Our Baseball Club’:  Two Early Baseball Novels”
Josh Howard, Middle Tennessee State University:  “Amateur Baseball in Alleghany County, VA, During the Late-Nineteenth Century”

Warren Tormey, Middle Tennessee State University:  “August 23rd, 1860:  The Day Baseball Fell”

10:30-11:30       Concurrent Sessions B


Session B1:  “Baseball and Locality”

Location:  Hazlewood                                   Chair:   

Amanda Bales, Lincoln University:  “Why I Want The Cubs to Win the World Series”

Michael Pagel, Northeastern State CC:  “William Heuman’s ‘Brooklyns Lose’ (1954):  Dodges Tragedy with the Goodwill of Neighbors”

Bill Gruber, Emory University:  “Jocks, Herbs, and the 1936 Yankees”

Session B2:  “Baseball in Film and TV”

Location:  Dining Rm. C                              Chair: 

Ginger Stelle, Morthland College:  “’E.T. Steal Home’:  Baseball on Star Trek:  Deep Space Nine and The X-Files”

Nick Bush, Motlow State CC:  “’Mookie Wilson.  That’s a Thing, Right?’—Pitching, Parody, and Perfection in How I Met Your Mother’s ‘Perfect Week’ Episode”

Ron Briley, Sandia Prep.:  “A New Beginning for the Baseball Film Genre:   Bang the Drum Slowly (1974)”

Session B3:  “Seeing Stars:  Baseball Heroes”

Location:  Faculty Senate Chambers          Chair:

Stephen Andrews, Grinnell College:  “On Leanne Howe’s Miko Kings:  An Indian Baseball Story”

R Dean Johnson, Eastern Kentucky University:  “All-Star Treatment”

Gina Logue, Middle Tennessee State University:  “Hank Aaron:  My Childhood Hero” 




11:40-12:05       Concurrent Sessions C

Session C1:  “Sports Business”

Location:  Hazlewood                                   Chair:

Don Roy,  Middle Tennessee State University:  “MLBAM:  ‘Trampling Snow’ to Bridge America’s Pastime and the Digital Future”

Session C2:  “Creative Fiction I”

Location:  Dining Rm. C                              Chair:

Craig Albin, Missouri State University:  “Judgment Call”:  A Short Story

Session C3:  “Winding Up…”

Location:  Faculty Senate Chambers          Chair:

Crosby Hunt, Middle Tennessee State University:  “Something on Ball Four”


12:15-2:00 Luncheon and Jim Bouton Talk
Tennessee Room

12:00-12:45 Lunch
12:45-1:30  Jim Bouton Talk (~20 min. talk + 10 min. Q&A)

Book Signing in James Union Lobby to follow talk

2:00-3:00 Concurrent Sessions D

Session D1: “Hall of Fame Decisions and Other Ethical Matters”

Location:  Hazlewood                                   Chair: 

Sarah Bunting, tomatonation.com:  “Facing Reality (TV):  Pet Rose’s Biggest Obstacle to the Hall Isn’t that He Bet on Baseball”

Ben Morrill, Middle Tennessee State Univeristy:  “The Baseball Hall of Fame’s Influence in the Development of Private Sports Museums and Halls of Fame”

* Phil Oliver, Middle Tennessee State University:  “Right When They’re Wrong:  Fallible Umpires and Infallible Rules”


Session D2:  Baseball Creative Fiction II

Location:  Dining Rm. C                              Chair: 

Thomas Luckie, Butler University:  “Rain Delay”

Steven Walker, Middle Tennessee State University:   “Civil War”

Tuesday, March 5, 2013

Nano Tech: Midterm Blog Post One


For my midterm assignment I plan to look at some of the innovations in the field of nanotechnology. I feel that genetic engineering and nanotechnology represents the future of the human race. As we evolve, grow, and expand, we face certain problems. These include disease, a lack of resources, and the desire to improve our general quality of living. I believe that these problems can be solved by developments in nano tech and genetic engineering. By reviewing some articles in favor of nano tech and some arguing against it I will show how this field is the future of our evolution. I also hope that anyone who has interest in the subject or disagrees will post in response to my midterm project.

The first subject that I want to address is food. We are dependent on food that requires a large amount of land to be cultivated. It is apparent that Earth's population is always on the rise. In order to meet our demand for food and avoid starvation, we will either have to create more areas for agriculture or we will have to engineer better food. As land mass on Earth is finite and deforestation is already a problem, I think that the obvious choice is to create better food.

http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/02/24/top-10-uses-of-nanotechnology-in-food/

The link above lists some of the ways that nano tech can improve our food. These improvements include more potent vitamins, longer lasting food, and less risk of bacteria like E. coli. There is also a way to block certain censors in our taste buds so that food can produce the tastes we enjoy. I know that this sounds like it could be dangerous, but it is based on a plant that does this naturally. A plant that has a very low sugar content can be altered to release a chemical that blocks the bitter sensors in your tongue, so that it will taste sweet.

http://nano.foe.org.au/node/198

Above is an article that claims that nano tech in our food supply is a threat to our health. The argument this writer supplies is that the science is new, unregulated and that packages do not warn customers of the use of nano tech. These are reasonable arguments, but I would have to argue that any new science posses a threat to someones health. The answer to this is to perfect the science, not to ban it. Furthermore, if people are experimenting with nano tech on food and not going through the FDA then they should be corrected, but I have found that this is not usually the case. Finally this writer argues that organic foods are a viable alternative to foods altered by science. I disagree, many people can not afford these foods. Also many people live in areas where organic foods are not readily available. Even if we were to expand organic farming, it is unlikely that the farm land could support our global population (and if it could, for how long?). We would eventually find ourselves in a situation where altered food became necessary and then the technology would be rushed, which would be more dangerous.

This is my first installment in my nano tech research. I will post more this week.
-Patrick Mcsweeney

Monday, March 4, 2013

Young Child "cured" of HIV infection: first of its kind.


Read the article HIV Patient about a young pediatric patient who was miraculously able to fight off HIV using only antiviral medication.  Leading scientists on the report make note that this is a perfect opportunity, and reason, to explore more differences in the immunity of young individuals compared to adults.  I hope discoveries of this sort get you as excited as they do me.

Mental Illness and Stigmas

Sherwin Nuland - How Electroshock Changed Me

I'm writing this from my iPad and can't quite figure out how to embed. The above link will open in a new window so we don't have to worry about redirection from the blog.  I would like to discuss some issues regarding mental health, both in treatment and in social stigma. I think that Dr. Nuland is a great place to start with this type of discussion.  Dr. Nuland was a well known surgeon in New Haven who struggled with crippling depression.  Because of his ECT he was able to overcome his illness, regain his position as a renowned surgeon, all while keeping his troubled relatively secret.  He is now a successful author and public speaker.

We've discussed in my physiology class how antidepressants can alter memory formation and may have long term complications when used in developing teens. Of course, ECT can also result in awful complications for those that does not help.  A question with mental health treatment that often is asked would be is it the right time to being treatment? Should we allow the patient to struggle in hopes that they will simply work through it?  I just wanted to introduce some of these discussions to begin thinking of discussion routes for my presentation.

Some other discussions of mental illness, including ECT discussions -

Battling Bipolar Disorder - NPR interview

Risks and Benefits of ECT - Talk of the Nation

Obliged to life

No new Bioethics cases from Glenn McGee today, we’re patiently working our way through midterm report presentations. (Joshua first, then Andrew, Cassie,...) Good opportunity to step back and ponder larger questions. Life. The Universe. Everything.

Well, what about life? What obliges us to preserve, protect, and defend it?

Komron’s report on physician-assisted suicide muddies the question. It seems the very least  a conscientious healer can do for some patients, in loyalty to life, is help them terminate an untenable and intolerable existence. Not to help, in those toughest cases, is to harm.

What’s wrong with misanthropy? Isn’t it the most rational stance, given our history? Why shouldn’t we notice and deplore and finally renounce all the collective harm we do to our planet and other species, and decide (with Vincent) that we  really ought to pull the plug on ourselves?

Continues at Up@dawn | reflections caught at daybreak

Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Alex Sarheed: Bioethical Dilemma

http://prezi.com/jjgbmypvfaco/present/?auth_key=t4iv9xo&follow=8y5cg0p1ailg&kw=present-jjgbmypvfaco&rc=ref-32586631

"Should We Prohibit Genetically Engineered Babies?"

I know I am a week behind the genetic modification talking points with this post, but I think it successfully recapitulates the myriad of bio-ethical dilemmas we face when confronted with the prospect of future "designer children," and allows both sides of the argument to be presented fairly with the purpose of edification.

Definitely worth a listen if you have the time.

http://www.npr.org/2013/02/15/172137776/should-we-prohibit-genetically-engineered-babies 

Hopeful Nostalgia

I will be sharing this video with the class today:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FgSmdfRUus

Also, I am speaking on a particular utopian society described in the book The Giver. Specifically, the lack of emotion in the society and the need for humanity to be in touch with itself in order to experience life.


Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Group 3 possible questions

I know it's extremely late to be posting these...but I figured something was better than nothing. Apologies for our slacking!

1.      The biggest concern for studies involving hallucinogens such as psilocybin is…
             Misleading messages about the safety of the drugs

2.      The oxygen-carrying blood substitute Polyheme was researched unethically due to…
A lack of informed consent

3.      Who are misleading patients to participate in pharmaceutical research for the sake of boosting their income?
Individual physicians

4.     Who is eligible to participate in pharmaceutical research?
Just about anyone

5.      Dr. Hwang and his lab scientists misleading of the public about their method of acquiring human eggs disproves what theory?
The Bad Apple Theory

6.      Genetically engineered humans may benefit the earth by…
Reducing consumption of the human body

7.      How will nanotechnology make viruses and components of our DNA more portable?
DNA codes will allow synthesizing machines to create viruses, embryos, tissue, etc.

Monday, February 25, 2013

Nick Barlow mid term blog. just starting hope to get some more info. please feel free to add comments at any time.


Nick Barlow's mid term blog

==
Hi, it's JPO piggy-backing on Nick's post & taking the liberty to suggest that if you like his report you'll like this too:




The Ethics of Physician-Assisted Suicide


[Komron MacLean]
Hey everyone, this is my mid-term report. I chose to discuss physician-assisted suicide (PAS) because I feel that it is an area of human medicine that, in our society, is misunderstood and undervalued, for several reasons. By reading ahead, you will see that I address both sides of the argument, for and against. You may learn a little about the technical aspects of PAS and also the laws that govern it in the United States. Although not comprehensive, I hope this essay contributes to your understanding of PAS and its significance to human medicine in our world today. 

The Ethics of Physician-Assisted Suicide
                The Hippocratic Oath, written between 400 and 300 B.C. is still taken and honored by medical doctors today, albeit in many different, highly modified forms. The mere fact that it has lasted so long, withstanding the trials and modifications of even this past century’s technological, cultural and medical advancements, proves its value and command over both ancient and modern practical medical ethics. It is a fact that the original Oath states, “To please no one will I prescribe a deadly drug nor give advice which may cause his death.”[1] The ancient guiding principle of health care, Primum non nocere- do no harm, is one principle that remains even today. Others pertain to patient confidentiality and honoring one’s teachers. Thus, it is clear that the original ethical code established for the governance of medical ethics holds a bold and unwavering stance on the subject of euthanasia. The Oath is not one bound by law but one simply of tradition and honor.
                Modern medical professionals display contrasting emotions regarding the Oath. Many feel that in order to practice modern medicine, which may require such actions as administering toxic chemotherapy, treatment with radiation and inducing potentially harmful events to yield a diagnosis, the do no harm aspect of the Oath must be violated daily.[2] As many other laws have since been adapted to modern society and many once unacceptable practices deemed necessary and suitable to our needs as a dynamic species, perhaps this oath will soon be amended to afford some form of physician-assisted suicide for the terminally ill. Currently, state laws govern such practices.
                There are three separate modes of euthanasia: passive euthanasia, non-active euthanasia and active euthanasia. Passive euthanasia involves withholding life support measures such as administration of fluids, antibiotics or other medications or treatments necessary to sustaining a patient’s life, while knowing that in doing so, and as a direct result of that action, the patient is certain to perish. Non-active euthanasia involves the termination of life support of a patient who can no longer consciously make that decision himself. Finally, active euthanasia, the most controversial means of euthanasia, is the direct administration of a lethal dose of a toxic substance to a patient in an attempt to abruptly end their life. Active euthanasia is the topic most often in question due to its common interpretation as homicide. 
               Active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (PAS) are viewed as two entirely separate events. Active euthanasia requires a physician to personally end the life of a patient in their care. Physician-assisted suicide on the other hand, refers to the physician providing the means and understanding by which a patient may, by his or her choice, ultimately end their life themselves.[3] After centuries of debate, consensus has not been reached among scholarly parties concerning this matter in particular. Is it murder or is it mercy? And, where are the lines drawn?
                This is indeed a multi-party debate not limited only to physicians, patients and state legislature. Monotheistic religion, as broad of a category as it is, has actually for the most part, come to a general agreement concerning the act of suicide itself. “Life is a gift from God, and  ‘each individual [is] its steward.’ Thus, only God can start a life, and only God should be allowed to end one.”[4] Some go so far as to say suicide is a sin. Followers of faith in a divine Creator believe that God would not give humanity anything it cannot handle, thus we must live as he created us and leave the physical world when called and not a minute sooner. In some religions such as Islam, the concept of “life not worth living” simply does not exist and any measure taken to counteract the continuance of life is considered cowardice or sinful.
                Meanwhile, other religious viewpoints described as being “liberal” and not believing in a single Creator or any at all, dictate an opposing view; “Each person has autonomy over their own life. Persons whose quality of life is nonexistent should have the right to decide to commit suicide, and to seek assistance if necessary.”[5] Both sides present strong arguments, but those acting on faith bear the burden of proof to justify their cause.
                Arguments supporting PAS include respect for autonomy, justice and compassion. The elements of respect for autonomy and compassion for the suffering are self explanatory. For a moment, place yourself in the shoes of a person suffering from Huntington’s disease.
You are 35 years old and your life is just falling into place. You are newly married and you are finally advancing in your career. One day you drop a coffee pot in the kitchen, and five years later, you are taking your meals through a tube to your stomach while your husband or wife works two jobs to support you while answering phone calls from the bank and collection agencies. All you can do is cry and blink. The doctor says you have two more years. Perhaps faith in God will soothe you while your wife changes your fecal bag.
                Justice applies to treating all cases individually but fairly. Not all cases are alike. One terminally ill patient who no longer has the desire to continue suffering may hasten their imminent demise by simply refusing treatment, or completing a DNR (do not resuscitate order). Another terminal patient in similar anguish, but with a differing medical issue, may not be able to quicken death simply by refusing treatment. Thus suicide becomes their only option for achieving swift freedom from torment. Both deserve equal consideration of their differing circumstances, and both should be given options suiting their needs. A woman indefinitely connected to a respirator; another with a degenerative neurological condition; a twelve-year old with cerebral palsy in constant, intractable pain; and a transient man with no identification who hit by a car, is now comatose and mortally injured in a public hospital’s ICU supported by tax dollars- four cases, all different. All are deserving of independent review and treatment. All will fall under separate ethical guidelines, but they certainly cannot be lumped under the same.
                Perhaps the clear, virtual basis for legalized PAS- the more rational component of justification- plays the leading role in support of physician-assisted suicide. The abortion of a healthy fetus upon request is legal in four US states regardless of justification. If aborting a healthy, viable life for any reason whatsoever is sanctioned, why then is a humane, physician guided endpoint for the terminally ill suffering from unmanageable pain or progressive, irreversible loss of somatic control deemed unlawful in the same states?[6]
                Thirty-five states actively euthanize convicted inmates as a form of capital punishment for crimes against their fellow citizens.[7] The definition of the noun form of the word “murder” is the killing of a human being under the conditions specifically covered by law.[8] Therefore if lethal injection, which is certainly the killing of a human being, is legal under U.S. law in thirty-five states as a means of terminating the life of a criminal, then it is arguable that a perfectly innocent, terminally ill patient, suffering in their own existence by no fault of their own, who has been deemed mentally stable, should be able to seek the help of knowledgeable personnel in reaching a swift, humane endpoint. This is not a question of yet legislated legal practice, but instead, of the ethical and moral principles that have guided our government’s decisions for the past 237 years of its existence. 
                The financial burden to caretakers of the terminally ill can also present an argument for PAS. It is no mystery that medical costs in the United States are high. Imagine a family with a single source of income, no health insurance and the significant financial burden of managing a terminal illness. In a best case scenario, the patient’s suffering is attenuated for a few months or years until they die; and in the meantime, the family is driven to financial ruin. PAS would be a significantly easier way of avoiding the total financial destruction of the household of a terminally ill patient while also providing the patient with a dignified endpoint, if they so chose it.
                Finally, openness of discussion brings up a very important and more legally limited point. There will, with certainty, be instances where patients “accidentally die of morphine overdose due to medical negligence”. It may be assumed that in some of those cases, there was a mutual understanding between physician and patient that the overdose of a barbiturate, opiate or other sedative would lead to a quick, painless death.[9] PAS’s illegalization prevents open discussion regarding the procedure and therefore precludes disclosure of its occurrence to everyone involved in the patient’s care, possibly leading to complications. These complications can further jeopardize the patient’s health.
Definitive arguments against PAS, excluding those concerning religion, include: potential abuse of the method, the marring of professional integrity, and fallibility of the profession. The argument surrounding abuse stems from the potential of a person without access to proper medical care, to be influenced in their decision to seek an easier, more “convenient” option rather than carrying on and possibly becoming a burden on those close to them. This is a very valid point, especially in light of recent events such as one case involving Dr. Jack Kevorkian, who claimed to have assisted in the deaths of at least 130 persons. Dr. Kevorkian claimed that he operated under strict guidelines. Examples of these guidelines seemed reasonable, such as only assisting diagnosed, terminally ill patients who had received matching diagnoses from at least two physicians and had expressed repeatedly their desire to die. Mental stability confirmed by a clinical psychologist was also a prerequisite. Yet a Detroit Free Press investigation in 1997 showed that “In fact, at least 60 percent of Kevorkian's suicide patients were not terminal. At least 17 could have lived indefinitely and, in 13 cases, the people had no complaints of pain”[10]. In the event that PAS were to be legalized, the definition of physician assisted suicide would need to be clear in both its limits as well as the circumstances surrounding its justification. Any right must not be abused.
Preservation of professional integrity dates back to the third century B.C. and is not a statute easily corrupted by any force, no matter how bold. With legalization of regulated physician-assisted suicide in the United States, there would be significant opposition even from within the medical community.
The Hippocratic Oath, whose guidance has given the medical trade honor and virtue for centuries, will be contested.  Also, the modern institutions that guide and represent doctors and other practitioners of medicine such as the American Medical Association, who feel that such permissive legislation will tarnish the “do no harm” reputation of its entrusted practitioners, also object.
The final and most logical of the arguments against PAS, is concern for fallibility of the profession. Doctors will inevitably make mistakes that could unnecessarily harm a patient promised a quick and painless release from their already agonizing life. While no doctor will claim to be infallible, the objection is sustained. This is a potential complication that must have its edges ironed out by bioethicists and physicians alike.
Ultimately, the best way to curb the debate and reach a logical and reasonable conclusion is that each case be treated individually, and for each decision to be reached independently and scientifically, rather than by merit of ancient tradition alone. The Oath, treated as a time honored guide for medicine, will remain debated from a contemporary perspective. In the end the decision will lie in the hands of the practitioner, whose ancient art is based on the Oath which in part reads, “I will give no deadly medicine to any one if asked, nor suggest any such counsel”[11] Perhaps medicine will retain its traditional values and keep separate the arts of healing the body and freeing the soul. Or, perhaps it will recognize that the same progression of thought and the bold pushing of boundaries that have raised the quality of life of the average individual from what it was centuries ago may elevate patient care even beyond what we now perceive as “ethical”.


Works Cited
Bioethics Education Project. Braddock, Clarence H.  University of Washington.  April 11th, 2008. Sept. 17th 2009 http://depts.washington.edu/bioethx/topics/pas.html#ques4
Cheyfitz, Kirk. "Suicide Machine, Part 1: Kevorkian rushes to fulfill his clients' desire to die". March 3, 1997. Detroit Free Press. Archived May 26, 2007.
Clark, Richard. Capital Punishment UK 1995. Sept. 17th 2009. http://www.capitalpunishmentuk.org/injection.html
Collier, P.F.  et. al. "Harvard Classics Volume 38" 1910. Sept. 17th 2009 http://www.euthanasia.com/oathtext.html  
"Murder." Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1). Random House, Inc. 17 Sep. 2009. Dictionary.com http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/murder>.
NOVA http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/doctors/oath_doctors.html  Retrieved 2-23-2013
Patients Rights Council  http://www.patientsrightscouncil.org/site/assisted-suicide-state-laws/ 2013Retrieved 2-22-13
Robinson, B.A. “Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide (PAS)” Religious Tolerance.org  2009-SEP-03. Sept. 17th 2009 http://www.religioustolerance.org/euthanas.htm
Weber, David O.  “Malpractice insurance rates reach boiling point: Physicians burned by lawyers,                     lawsuits and jury awards - Doctors, Lawyers and Lawsuits” BNet . March 2002. Sept. 17th 2009                      http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0843/is_2_28/ai_84236557/


[2] http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/doctors/oath_doctors.html. Retrieved 2013-02-23
[6] http://www.patientsrightscouncil.org/site/assisted-suicide-state-laws Retrieved 2013-02-22
[10] http://www.freep.com/article/20070527/NEWS05/70525061/SUICIDE-MACHINE-PART-1-Kevorkian-rushes-fulfill-his-clients-desire-die Retrieved 2013-02-22

Exam 1 Study Guide

Wednesday's exam will be drawn as much as possible from questions the class has submitted. Here's what we have so far. It's not too late to add or amend. (Group 3?)

Don't forget you can prepare your extra credit discussion question in advance. Just a paragraph or two, on a relevant topic of your choosing... worth up to ten points (enough to offset a couple of misses).

And remember, the best way to study for this is to locate the relevant textual passages and familiarize yourself with them.

Proposed Exam questions: Group 1

[Komron MacLean] Questions for Bioethics

What is Craig Venter best known for?
Answer: creating the first self replicating microorganism in a lab. 

Which contraceptive stops the period entirely?
Lybrel 

What scandal is Woo-suk Hwang of South Korea best known for? 
Fabricating Data to support research

What was the name of the clinical trial in Alabama in which hundreds of African American men were infected with Syphilis and left untreated? 
Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment 

In Carl Elliott's article "This is Your Country on Drugs", steroids were used as a platform for the misuse of what? 
General enhancement technology

Given a scenario where one woman donates an "egg shell" another donates her DNA and a third carries the fertilized egg to term, who is considered the biological mother?
The woman who donates the most genetic material 
==


Possible Questions Group 2


Bioethics Factual Questions:
Case 2: According to a February 2011 Gallup poll, what percentage of Americans believe in evolution? Answer: 40 percent.
Case 10: In 2005 the NIH announced that employees would have to sell their stock interests and would no longer be able to purchase stock. To whom did these regulations apply?
a.) Only Doctors currently writing prescriptions
b.) All Doctors and researchers
c.) All employees
d.) All employees and spouses (Correct Answer)
Case 14: The concern with testing at the Indian Pharmaceutical Facilities was...
a.) Subjects were not receiving full disclosure of possible dangers (Correct Answer)
b.) Subjects were not told what drugs they were on
c.) Subjects were abducted off the street
d.) Subjects were not paid what they were promised
==
Group 3???
==

Group Four Study Guide Questions


1.      Which rule was not among the three guidelines adopted by the South Korean government’s Code for Robot Ethics committee that were outlined in Isaac Asimov’s story ‘Runaround.’


a.      A robot may not injure a human being, or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
b.      A robot must defer to governmental laws and ethics when not in the presence of his original master as long as this does not conflict with either of the other two laws.
c.       A robot must obey orders given by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the first law.
d.      A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the other two laws.    
     

2.      What does iPSC stand for?

a.      Iatrogenic Pharmaceutical Stem Cells
b.       Idiopathic  Physicochemical Stem Cells
c.       Immunological Paliative Stem Cells
d.      Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

3.      Which ‘reproductive freedom model’ have the National Bioethics Advisory Commission used to make the claim that cloning is physiologically unsafe?

a.      Pediatric Model
b.      Adoption Model
c.       Adolescent Model
d.      Paternal Model

4.      True or False? IVF is most affordable in the United States.
False


(Post by Betsy)

1 comment:

  1. 5) The Dickey-Wicker Amendment, a Federal law, prohibits______.
    A) abortion
    *B) THE DESTRUCTION OF EMBRYOS FOR RESEARCH
    C) stem cell research
    D) the funding of stem cell research

Nick Barlow needs to move to the blog post group. I am still under the flu bug and public speaking would not be great for me at this time.

In Refutation, A Conversation on Ray Kurzweil's Singularity

Download Article

A sample of the Resolution: "Ray Kurzweil has discovered through his Law of Accelerating Returns, which is an expansion of Moore's Law, that computer technology's progression, due to it being absorbed as an Information Technology, is undergoing an exponential increase that will result in said technology’s interpretive faculties exceeding humans. The root of this exponential growth will come from the study and implementation of the advanced hierarchal thinking found within the Neo Cortex into various emergent technologies. (Authors@Google, 2012)"

Alex Sarheed: I'd like to go second if possible

My presentation will target the dilution of the problems we've covered in class; I'll to take us through the complexity of doing the  "right thing" and help explain why it so dense, and why society has so many conflicts in terms of bioethical research, treatment, and healthcare. I will be discussing far more than presenting, however, i will use my presentation as a guide so the class follows me to final conclusion. That bioethics cannot be addressed individually, that a doctor cannot perform ethical medicine; instead, society determines the ethics by which it expects from its citizens, and each individual operates within the infringements the ethical framework instills. These infringements contain the harshness of our primitive nature, our desire to excel, suppress, investigate, overpower, strengthen and advance.
I hope this embeds correctly.  This TedMed talk is about the fascinating, and unacceptable, practice of "data choosing."  Peer-reviewed journals are always looking for the newest and coolest avenue in science to publish about.  There are a few hot topics like stem cells, cancer, and pharmacology that are received with gratitude when submitted for publication by researchers.  However, the less exciting topics, in particular the ones that did not come to fruition experimentally, are ignored and refused publication.  The problem is that in essence we are seeing some of what we did right and almost none of what we did wrong.


http://www.ted.com/talks/ben_goldacre_what_doctors_don_t_know_about_the_drugs_they_prescribe.html

Singular medicine

Our scheduled #Bioethics cases today concern the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, Eclipse pseudo-cigarettes, the continuing absence (despite the presence of the 2010 Affordable Care Act) of universal healthcare in America, and special interest neo-natal screening. The main connecting theme here is the ever-rising cost of healthcare and how much cheaper it would be to provide real prevention on the front end, rather than hit-or-miss cures on the downslope… and how much entrenched resistance and counter-investment blocks that approach.

 Interesting topics all, and I hope we don’t get to them today. (Don’t worry, class, they’ll not be on Wednesday’s exam.)

That’s because I hope we get immersed instead in our midterm report presentations, commencing with William’s “disproving Ray Kurzweil’s numbers on the Singularity.” Guess he wants to squash my last thin reed of hope that I might still live long enough to live forever. Or is he going to tell us it’s nearer than even Ray thinks? Not likely...

(Continues at Up@dawn)