Up@dawn 2.0

Thursday, February 26, 2015

Athletic enhancement presentation. 
(Greg, Rory, and Ramsey) 

Greg's contribution. 

Health Effects of Athletic Enhancements

Apart form the obvious negative bioethical associations, drugs used to enhance athletic performance have got and are associated with extreme health consequences which in turn present a whole new aspect of bioethics not associated with sports, but with health issues and burdens on society at large.
Steroidal use in Athletes is associated with:

In Men:
Reduced sperm production
Testicular atrophy
Gynecomastia
Male-pattern baldness

In women:
Masculinization/defeminization of the female body and genitalia

Additional effects are:
Cardio vascular disease
Premature growth plate closure
Liver tumors
Acne
Prostate Cancer

Given the high prevalence of some of these conditions in steroid abusing individuals, should it be allowed knowing full well the possible health consequences? Where can we/do we draw a line with these substances? Should we as a community be expected to pay for the medical costs incurred later on in life? Are the potential harms of these substances really worth the athletic enhancement? At what cost are we prepared to accept the entertainment value of enhancement? Is there any meaning full payback for society associated with Steroid abuse?

These are just some of the questions that are raised as a result of steroid abuse. Most people have the opinion that “its their body, who are we to stand in their way”. But what happens when these drugs have an ultimate cost to society. In a world where there are so many real issues, is this something we should be encouraging and tolerating? Our freedoms and actions are always limited by the extent to which they harm others. We should not loose track of our interconnectedness. 

Wednesday, February 25, 2015

Genetic Enhancement and the Bigger More Positive Picture

Chant, Tim, and Eleanor Nelsen. "Genetically Engineering Almost Anything."NovaNext. PBS, 17 July 2014. Web. 18 Feb. 2015.

My contribution to my groups topic on Genetic Enhancements is to cover the positive attributes towards the science. I’m highlighting the reasons why genetic enhancement, and particularly gene insertion and deletion, should be viewed as a blessing to society rather than simply parents creating children tailored towards specific needs or wants in their lives, or people merely floating their ways to the top instead of using the hard work ethic America is so found of.

Genetic enhancement has gotten a bad reputation throughout the years, most famously people claim that scientists are trying to play God and shouldn’t mess with the natural order of things. But what exactly defines genetic enhancements? Should we view the vaccines our children, and we ourselves, have received over the years as a genetic enhancement,  considering they are unnatural in their own right, being made in a laboratory and injected into our bodies? Do steroids constitute as a genetic enhancement since they promote the rapid growth of muscles that would not naturally be found in the person taking them? At what point do we decide which enhancements are good or bad? Perhaps wrinkle creams and tanning lotions should be turned aside as well. The fact these creams and lotions alter the bodies genes to prevent wrinkles or cause the skin to turn shades darker at a rapid pace, when in fact it is not natural for these things to occur naturally in the body. We wrinkle, some of us are pasty throughout life, but when do we choose what is too far for science and what is just enough to satisfy every soccer moms craving of being a sun kissed cocoa dream?

One such way to look at genetic enhancement is to think of it as an improvement of self. If you could have increased memory capabilities, a better metabolism, be stronger physically, would you not see these things as desirable? If the technology is able, why should one go through the blood, sweat, and tears, so to speak, simply to lift a few extra pounds? Is it really worth subscribing to lumosity to attempt to remember those last few items on your shopping list? Wouldn't you want the best for your child? Not having to struggle through memorizing their multiplication tables with a simple insertion of a gene before birth? Potentially having the upper hand at baseball or basketball, not having to worry about the fragility of breaking a bone while at practice, or pulling a muscle and missing the big game. Maybe even having a simple boost with their physical strength could help them achieve their dreams of climbing Mount Everest. Say you were always terrible at learning to play an instrument, nothing ever stuck in your mind about what hand goes where and what note to strike when, so you request to have your child's musical ability heightened. With a genetic enhancement, they can flourish. They find a group where they seem to fit in so naturally, people who understand them and can help them reach the best of their potential, a group that understands the same things they're going through when learning to play new pieces or learn a new instrument. Could you honestly think this is such a bad thing to want for a child? Genetic enhancements can help the world, and the people in it, find out how to be the very best them they can be!

Plucked from the twitter-stream

Bioethics (@BioethicsRR)
Lying, Bullshitting, and Atul Gawande rightrelevance.com/tw/bioethicsrr…
The Conversation US (@US_conversation)
Medical tourism isn't always a fair deal for developing countries: theconversation.com/medical-touris…

Tuesday, February 24, 2015

Link to Atul Gawande's page.

Link to his page if you interested to know more.

http://atulgawande.com

American roots of Nazi Eugenics

Interesting read on Eugenics.

http://historynewsnetwork.org/article/1796
Is modern eugenics wrong?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kRp_FjMjs2k
The case against perfection ch. 4
Fact questions

1. Who called for eugenics to be " introduced into the national conscience, like a new religion " (p. 63)

2. Who opened the Eugenics Records Office in Cold Spring Harbor, Long Island? ( p. 64)

3. In Germany, America's eugenics Legislation found an admirer in __________, who later carried eugenics beyond sterilization to mass murder and genocide. (p.66-67)

4. Describe the free-market eugenics policy of Singapore's prime minister, Lee Juan Yew. (p.69)

5. Jurgan Habermas's case against liberal eugenics is especially intriguing because he believes it rest wholly on _____________ and need not invoke spiritual or theological notions. (p.79)

Discussion questions

1. Is genetic engineering  another form of eugenics?

2 . Do you believe that there will be state-imposed genetic engineering later in the future?

3. Does genetic engineering go against the "notion of giftedness"?


Healthcare programs within USA


                My part of the project in my group is to talk about one of the largest healthcare benefits organizations in the American healthcare system and how it has changed over time, TennCare. My family used to participate in this program at some point in time and I thought it was perfect to look up the history of what I once was a part of. Tenncare has an overall goal of giving people healthcare benefits and insurance to the people who need it most. The one thing that has changed over time is the ideal situation and people that they could do something about. Over time, it has created 18 programs to help those in need. Just to give an idea of the history of Tenncare and changes in eligibility and benefits over time, here’s a summary I made of the changes that have occurred. One thing that I did not know before was that Tenncare, a major health care organization, is made up of multiple health organizations. So while looking into the history, you will find out some organizations left, some disappeared forever and new ones and came in over time to help out. Also, the history further reveals the importance of a role of being a health care provider. Your words in the future may honestly bring stability to state or national funding programs for health care. Your opinion WILL play a major role in shaping society in some form in the future.

Tenncare
Tenncare was implemented in 1994 and at first covered three programs: Group 1(Medical Eligibles), Group 2(Uninsured people who lacked access to insurance of a prior date-March 1993- and still continued to lack access) and Group 3(Uninsurable people who were turned down for health insurance due to certain medical conditions).In December 1994 Tenncare almost reached its capacity for the uninsured category and couldn’t accept anyone else, but if you were on Medicaid at the time and were about to lose and fit the uninsured category, you were allowed to continue the program. This was when TennCare possibly realized that they need to be more specific about benefits to make sure the ideal capacity is reached. Tenncare expanded to have services for substance abuse and mental health in 1996. An agreed order known as Grier had helped people in appealing denials they had gotten from the program and in April 1997 uninsured children under the age of 18 could get Tenncare. There wasn’t any income limit for anyone in this category, but if you were over poverty level, cost sharing was required. In May 1997, enrollment was opened to dislocated workers, who were defined as people who lost work through a bonafide plant closing. By January 1998, uninsured children’s category was extended to 19 years of age with same rules applying as before. Also if parents had insurance, had a family income 200% below poverty level, and the children did NOT have insurance, they could get insurance. If income was above that level, cost sharing was need in family. Xantus, one of third largest medical care organizations, was placed in receivership under Tenncare by March 31, 1999. Prudential, a small medical care organization, gave notice in June 1999 that it would be leaving Tenncare. It only served people in the Shelby County area. By November 1999, Xantus was struggling to pay health care providers for participants in its programs so the state of Tennessee gave it $26 million as a loan to pay providers. By December 1999, Blue Cross Blue Shield, one of TennCare’s largest Medical care organization gave notice it was leaving but it withdrew its termination. By January 2000, the governor, Sundquist arranged a 17 member commission on the future of Tenncare to figure out what to do when Tenncare waiver expired in 2001. By March 2000, Sundquist hosted a  summit on the future of Tenncare to gather ideas from hospital executives, doctors, managed care executives and tennessee lawmakers to get ideas for the program in the near future. A man named John Tighe proposed the idea of Tenncare II. It outlined a business model that called for more accountability in the program in May 2000. Also during this time, Tenncare had been approved for children heald under state custody(foster care; children removed from homes). By July 2000, pharmacy benefits for dual eligibles were taken out of the MCO program. This meant that if you were trying to  use benefits in two different Tenncare related programs, you couldn’t use two at the same time to get certain medicines. By September 2000, multiple MCO’s denied the implementation of Grier to be appealed. By November 2000, Commission on the Future of Tenncare presented its ideas to the governor. By July 2001, Tenncare acquired two operational MCOs: Better Health Plans and Universal Care. By July 2002, Tenncare was altered in the following matter:
 “TennCare was revamped with the intention of dividing it into three programs: one for Medicaid eligibles (TennCare Medicaid), one for demonstration eligibles (TennCare Standard), and one for low income persons who needed help in purchasing available insurance (TennCare Assist). Each of the programs was to have a separate benefit structure.
TennCare Assist has not yet been funded, and the TennCare Standard benefit package has not been implemented due to a settlement agreement reached in Federal Court. All persons enrolled in TennCare currently have the same package of benefits.
Eligibility changes in the new program included the following:
A new Medicaid eligibility category was added. This category covered uninsured women under the age of 65 who had been determined by a Centers for Disease Control (CDC) site to be in need of treatment for breast or cervical cancer. There was no income limit on this category for Medicaid, although CDC required that women receiving screenings at a CDC site have incomes below 250% poverty. Medicaid eligibles have no cost-sharing requirements.
The category of "Uninsurables" was replaced by a category called "Medically Eligibles." New persons can enroll in this category if they do not have insurance, they meet "ME" criteria, and their incomes are below the poverty level. Medical eligibility must be proven through a medical underwriting process, rather than being proven simply by a "turn-down" letter from an insurance company.
The definition of "Uninsureds" was tightened by providing a more restrictive definition of the term "insurance." Certain groups of uninsured people who were already on TennCare were "grandfathered" into the new program.
Persons losing Medicaid eligibility or already enrolled in TennCare in some other category on July 1, 2002, were allowed to remain on the program if they were uninsured AND their incomes did not exceed 100% poverty for adults and 200% poverty for children OR if they were determined to be "medically eligible" at any income level.
New enrollment in the Uninsured category was closed. Provisions were made for an annual open enrollment period for low-income people in this category, depending upon the availability of legislative appropriations.
A process called "reverification" was begun whereby all persons in the demonstration population were asked to make appointments at the Department of Human Services so that DHS could determine whether these individuals were eligible for Medicaid, eligible for TennCare under the new criteria, or no longer eligible for TennCare under the new criteria.”(Citation: tn.gov)
                                              Figure 1: Example of some of TennCare's programs

By October 2002, Tenncare had acquired dental care benefits. All Pharmacy services had been moved to one Pharmacy benefits manager by July 2003. By 2004, more regulations were placed over pharmaceuticals and adults in the uninsured category. Children who were uninsured got to keep same benefits while restrictions were made more tightly around adults, especially eligibility into the uninsured category. Another reform called TennCare Transformation was proposed in 2004, but unless certain modifications were made, it was not going to get enacted. The governor did not want to pursue these modifications, so he was planning to drop Tenncare as a whole and just focus on Medicaid, but he did not want to leave children without benefits. In 2005, they closed the non-pregnant adult medically needy category of its programs because of expenses. In 2006, they broughtthis program back by creating an initiative to lower spending. In 2008, home health and nursing services were limited. By May 2009, re-verification forms were set in place so that TennCare can determine on a yearly basis if enrollees are still eligible for program. For those who lost eligibility, they still had benefits through MediCare. In February 2010, Affordable Health care Act was passed, which greatly impacted Tenncare. In the same month, TennCare submits Amendment nine for requests in benefit reductions and elimination of most adults participating in Tenncare. TennCAre choices in Long-Term Care program was available for people in Middle Tennessee by 2010. It provided community and home based services for people in need. The General Assembly had also passed in 2010 a hospital assessment for hospital that will generate revenue for TennCare because of the recession. By May 2010, TennCare had more than enough revenue to survive, so Amendment 9 was no longer necessary. By December 2010, Tenncare implements Public Hospital Supplemental Payment program, which was passed by submitting Amendment 11. By February 2011, Tenncare submits Amendment 12 to limit adults in program to state budget. By July 2011, Tenncare began covering medically approved smoking cessation products. Previously the benefits were only for pregnant women and people under age 21. By November 2011, surveys were done on TennCare. It was discovered that it had 95% participant satisfaction. Over the years TennCare keeps accepting applicants in their Spend Down program for people in need of health insurance.


Some statistics from the Healthcare and Finance Administration FY 2015 Budget presentation(http://www.tn.gov/tenncare/forms/HCFAbudgetFY15.pdf)


Figure 2: TennCare overall use in 2014

Figure 3: Estimate Increase in costs for 2015

Figure 4: Participant Satisfaction 


Links: http://www.tn.gov/tenncare/news-timeline.shtml
http://www.tnjustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/10-20-10-TnCareEligibilityChart.pdf
http://www.tn.gov/tenncare/forms/HCFAbudgetFY15.pdf




















Monday, February 23, 2015

Group 3 Vaccinations Project

     My portion of the project will cover what would happen if vaccines didn't exist and also what would happen if everyone stopped getting vaccinated.

     If vaccinations never existed, measles, diphtheria, polio, flu, whooping cough, and a myriad of viruses would be in epidemic proportions in the world.  World travel has only increased since vaccinations were created.  Travel between countries would pose an even bigger threat to public health if vaccines did not exist.  Here is an example of one of the viruses that would be in epidemic proportions now if it were not for vaccines.
     Poliomyelitis, polio, is a crippling infectious disease.  Once the polio virus infects a host, it invades the brain and the spinal cord resulting in paralysis.  72% of people infected with polio do not show the symptoms associated with the disease (sore throat, fever, tiredness, nausea, headache, stomach pain). 1 out of 25 infected people develop meningitis, and 1 in 200 develop paralysis.



     Similar effects would occur if the vaccination process suddenly halted.  In 1974 80% of children in Japan were vaccinated for pertussis (whooping cough).  There were only 393 cases of pertussis in the entire country.  Plus, there wasn't a single death.  Then people became complacent and stopped getting vaccinated.  Only 10% of children were vaccinated which resulted in 13,000 cases of whooping cough and 41 deaths.
     If vaccinations were to suddenly stop, then the world would revert to the state it was in before they were started.  Diseases close to eradication would flare up again, and all the effort put into stopping them would be wasted.  The amount of cases of disease would increase, and a large portion of the world population would perish.

Memory Enhancement

Our group chose to discuss the topic of memory enhancement. Memory loss is something that most people are familiar with, especially when it comes to Alzheimer's disease. Something like memory enhancement could benefit people suffering from this disease and help them to spend the rest of their lives comfortably. Memory loss can be stressful and terrifying for the people suffering from it, and damaging to the families who have loved ones suffering from it as well. Online, it is suggested that people stay mentally sharp and and stimulate themselves intellectually. One of the tools that people can use to exercise their brains is also one of my favorite puzzle-based video game series: Professor Layton.


 
 


Study Guide

Study for the exam by re-reading and reflecting on relevant texts, NOT by rote memorization. Prepare your extra-credit response in advance by printing your reply to the DQ of your choice, just a couple of paragraphs will suffice. Bring it with you on Thursday.

1. What is the difference between (normal) medical care and palliative care? (BB104)
Answer:  medical care focuses on cure and diagnosis and palliative care focuses on the comfort of terminal patients.

2.What code was drawn up after WWII and states "The health of my patient will be my first consideration."? (BB80)
Answer:  The Geneva Code of Medical Ethics

3.What were the five religions discussed by the author of Bioethics: The Basics? (BB63)
Answer:  Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, and Buddhism

4. What is preventive medicine? (BB138)
Answer:  a field that devises measures to prevent and control disease

5. As athletic enhancement increases, what fades? (AP25)
Answer:  admiration

6. Chapter 3 begins by asking if our bioethical perspective ("vision") is skewed by ______... (BB48)
(a) cultural assumptions, (b) gender bias, (c) religious faith, (d) all of the above
Answer: D

7.What doctrine requires that all research protocols must be submitted to a "research ethics committe before the study begins"? (BB117)
Answer: Helsinki Declaration

8. What is a biobank? (BB133)
Answer:  a collection of biological samples or genetic information

9. What are the three types of valid consent? (BB83)
Answer:  Competent, Informed and Voluntary

10. The idea that the doctor always knows best is called what? (BB82)
Answer Paternalism
==
The _________ required that 'The health of my patient must be my first consideration.' (Hippocratic Oath, Geneva Code, British Medical Association, International Association of Bioethics)
Answer: Hippocratic Oath (BB 2)

2. What are the three types of valid consent for human participation in research?
Answer: Competent, Informed and Voluntary (BB 83)

3. Sandel's deepest moral objection to enhancement is its alleged disfigurement of what relation?
Answer: parent-child relationship (pg. 46)

Rory CapstickFebruary 23, 2015 at 12:06 PM
4. As athletic enhancement increases, what fades?
5. How do Ritalin, Adderall etc differ from recreational drugs of the past?
  1. 3. What do genetically altered athletes corrupt? 29

    4. Sandel thinks Lasik surgery to correct normal vision would be an acceptable enhancement for a golfer under what condition? 31

    5. Does Sandel allege an ethical problem with mega-calorie diets? 35
  2. 3. Designing parents are more likely to do what, or to neglect what parental duty? 49-50

    4. Does Sandel consider genetic engineering similar in spirit to expensive private schools & tutors, piano lessons, SAT prep, etc.? 52

    5. "Parents of college students are out of control." 54 How so?

    6. How do Ritalin, Adderall etc differ from recreational drugs of the past? 60-61
1. "We do not view what we did as very different from what many straight couples do..." What did they do? CP 2

2. How much did Genetic Savings & Clone plan to charge for cloned canines? 5

3. According to what objection is genetic engineering objectionable because "designer children" are not fully free? OR, Why does Sandel not find this objection persuasive? 7

  1. 3. Another name for the micro-allocation of health care, concerned with prioritizing access to given treatments, is what? (HINT: This was hotly debated and widely misrepresented ("death panels" etc.) in the early months of the Obama administration.) 145
  2. 4. What "perverse incentive" to health care practitioners and institutions do reimbursement systems foster, as illustrated by excessive use of MRIs? 146
6. Who propounded a theory of justice that invokes a "veil of ignorance"? 157
1. Name one of the basic requirements agreed upon by all codes devised to protect individuals from malicious research. 116

2. What decree states that consent must be gained in all experimentation with human beings? 119

4. Which famous contemporary philosopher coined the term speciesism? 122

6. What is the term for altering the numbers in a calculation to make the hypothesis more convincing, with no justification form the research findings for such members? 127

2. What (according to most recognized oaths and conventions) must always be the deciding factor guiding professional decisions? 81

4. Is a diagnosis of mental illness grounds for establishing a patient's lack of capacity to render competent consent to treatment? 84

5. What general principle allows breach of confidentiality? 88

2. What's the leading global cause of death among women of reproductive age? (49)

4. What ethical perspective did Nel Noddings (supported by Carol Gilligan's research) describe as the "feminine approach"? (55)

5. What's a furor therapeuticus? (56)

6. Does Campbell consider the outlawing of female genital mutilation culturally insensitive? (58)


BB2-

2. Which theory has been dominant in bioethics and often used by many health professionals?

3. In deontological theory, what is the difference between hypothetical and categorical imperatives?


6. What more do we want from a moral theory than Kant gives us?

3. The _________ required that 'The health of my patient must be my first consideration.' (Hippocratic Oath, Geneva Code, British Medical Association, International Association of Bioethics) (BB 2)

5. What did Ivan Ilich warn about in Medical Nemesis? (BB 5)

6Bioethics has expanded its focus from an originally narrower interest in what relationship? (BB 8)

Sunday, February 22, 2015

Group 3 Vaccination Project

     My group chose vaccination as our midterm project, and my task is to describe the pros of getting vaccinated.  I will talk about the top reasons to get vaccinated, namely the benefits to one’s health and lifestyle and to society as a whole.  The number of communicable diseases in developed countries has plummeted dramatically within the past century, which has contributed to an overall increase in the standard of living and productivity of the citizens within those countries.  Not only are people living healthier, disease-free lives, they are able to live longer and get sick less often since they are under attack by fewer disease causing agents.  This saves them time as well as money, as they are not having to recover from major illness as often as past generations and they are able to miss less work in doing so. Also, those who get vaccinated are able to protect those unable to receive the vaccine, whether due to an allergy to the ingredients or some other valid reason.  By having so little opportunity to infect individuals and spread, a disease is neutralized through herd immunity if a high enough percentage of the population is protected against that disease.  However, this barrier begins to break down once enough people stop becoming immunized.  This chink in the armor of protection against disease allows enough room for a disease to infect the unprotected and possibly mutate around the vaccine, so that everyone is at risk.  Also, it is much easier to isolate a single case than to stop an uncontrolled spread, which is yet another reason for as many people as possible to be protected.  All these reasons and more will comprise my portion of our project on Thursday.

Exam 1 Study Guide (Group 3)

1. What is the difference between (normal) medical care and palliative care? (BB104)
Answer:  medical care focuses on cure and diagnosis and palliative care focuses on the comfort of terminal patients.

2.What code was drawn up after WWII and states "The health of my patient will be my first consideration."? (BB80)
Answer:  The Geneva Code of Medical Ethics

3.What were the five religions discussed by the author of Bioethics: The Basics? (BB63)
Answer:  Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, and Buddhism

4. What is preventive medicine? (BB138)
Answer:  a field that devises measures to prevent and control disease

5. As athletic enhancement increases, what fades? (AP25)
Answer:  admiration

6. Chapter 3 begins by asking if our bioethical perspective ("vision") is skewed by ______... (BB48)
(a) cultural assumptions, (b) gender bias, (c) religious faith, (d) all of the above
Answer: D

7.What doctrine requires that all research protocols must be submitted to a "research ethics committe before the study begins"? (BB117)
Answer: Helsinki Declaration

8. What is a biobank? (BB133)
Answer:  a collection of biological samples or genetic information

9. What are the three types of valid consent? (BB83)
Answer:  Competent, Informed and Voluntary

10. The idea that the doctor always knows best is called what? (BB82)
Answer Paternalism

Group 1 Test Questions

1. The _________ required that 'The health of my patient must be my first consideration.' (Hippocratic Oath, Geneva Code, British Medical Association, International Association of Bioethics)
Answer: Hippocratic Oath (BB 2)

2. What are the three types of valid consent for human participation in research?
Answer: Competent, Informed and Voluntary (BB 83)

3. Sandel's deepest moral objection to enhancement is its alleged disfigurement of what relation?
Answer: parent-child relationship (pg. 46)

(More questions to follow in the comments)

Friday, February 20, 2015

"A Mother’s Battle Against Medical Errors"

Hundreds of thousands of people in the U.S. die from medical errors every year. It is the third leading cause of death in the United States.

Carole Hemmelgarn is on a mission to help medical professionals avoid errors. She says the healthcare system failed her family and her daughter.

“I had a 9-year-old daughter, named Alyssa, and she was diagnosed with leukemia on a Monday and she died 10 days later,” said Hemmelgarn.

Listen:


Here&Now

Perfectly funny

But the laugh's on who?



Image result for designer baby cartoon

Thursday, February 19, 2015

Michael J. Sandel on Hyperparentinghttp://www.dailymotion.com/video/xgii8e_michael-sandel-on-hyperparenting_news
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xgii8e_michael-sandel-on-hyperparenting_news
The case against perfection, ch. 3 Designer children, Designing parents
Fact questions

1. Parenthood, more than other human relationships, teaches what the theologian William F. May calls an "____________________________________". (p.45)

2. What are the two aspects of parental love? (p.49)

3. Richard Williams and Earl Woods are examples of _____________________, bent on making champions of their children (p. 52)

4. (T/F) From 1992 to 2001, Princeton, a leading test prep company, saw its gross revenues increase 225 percent. (p.55)

5. Name one of the drugs used for ADHD that was given as an example in the chapter 3. (p.59)

Discussion Questions

1.  Do you believe that our society is encouraging hyperparenting and what can we do to control it?

2. Children are consider gifts and blessings, do parents have the right to change and modify any aspect of their life?

3. Parents who want to genetically enhance their children; are they doing it for the well being of their child or is it their selfish desires for a perfect child?
DQ: If the option to give an offspring the best genetics is available and very financially affordable, is it morally wrong to deny the offspring of those genetics?

DQ: When/where is it appropriate to "draw the line" when it comes to ethical dilemmas of medicine? In other words, why is it okay to provide certain "tiers" of healthcare to a patient (such as IV injection, blood pressure medication, surgery, etc.) but NOT okay to provide other "tiers" of healthcare (i.e. genetic modification)? Why is one okay, but not the other? Is it more logical to either support all or none?
The case against perfection ch. 2 Bionic Athletes
Fact questions

1. In 1999 _____ _____ underwent lasik eye surgery to improve his vision and he won his next five tournaments. (p.30)

2. What corporation now sponsors a high-tech training experiment in a hermetically sealed " altitude house" in Portland, Oregon? (p.32)

3. What does the autor say about spectacles in sports? (p.37)

4. What is the effect of the beta-blockers taken for stage performance? (p.39)

Discussion Questions

1. Is there a way that bioengineering and technology can highlight the talents and skills that distinguish the best players instead of obscuring it? 

2. Will bioengineering turn sports into a spectacle instead of a true test of talent and effort?

3.Do you think that bioengineering will create a big divide between  athletes who are genetically engineered and athletes who are natually gifted?

Wednesday, February 18, 2015

Article and Questions

Here's an article on Ritalin use.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/medicating/readings/publicinterest.html


FQ:
(AP 59) True or False:  It is estimated that 5 to 6 percent of children under 18 are prescribed to Ritalin and other stimulants.

DQ:
Are hyperparenting and genetic manipulation different from one another?  Is planning out the career path/life for your children, like Richard Williams, any different than controlling them by genetic manipulation?

Tuesday, February 17, 2015

The Case Agianst Perfection, Chapter 2


FQ: What was the goal of the "altitude house"?



FQ: The line: "kiss of death for good singing," was referring to singers having surgery to improve their vocal chords. (T/F)



DQ: Would separating genetically enhanced sports from non-genetically altered sports be successful?



DQ: In terms of technological innovations, including genetic enhancements, how can we tell between changes that will help improve life for everyone from changes that will only improve life for the individual?

Sn'ice day!

Image result for snow day calvin and hobbes

Monday, February 16, 2015

McDonald's Immortal Hamburgers

I know this isn't dealing with anything bioethical, but I do know on our peripatetic walk on Thursday we got around to GMOS and McDonald's came up. I found a link talking about how their burgers (and food in general) never seem to mold or rot. Maybe you'll be interested in knowing the how's as well, sorry if this ruins their "food" for you.

http://www.iflscience.com/health-and-medicine/heres-why-mcdonalds-burgers-don-t-rot

Sunday, February 15, 2015

Peripatetic Discussion 2/12


We took an adventure through the library for our peripatetic discussion this afternoon. While roaming through each floor our main topic was focused on bioengineering and the ethics of genetic enhancement. Our first hit of the topic was the situation of two deaf mothers choosing a deaf sperm donor for their child in order for the child to connect better with the parents. The major question of this decision is whether it is ethically right to this. The first, and most prominent, argument was that it can in no way be right to choose a child’s trait to be one that may hinder them for the rest of their life, especially in a situation where the child has no choice. A counter argument was that it is the parent’s choice for the child and deaf parents would have a different perspective on deafness as a deficiency and in many cases may even desire such a trait for the child to better understand and connect to the parents in the world they see and will teach to them.

The discussion then continued to the idea of how it may be unethical in the majority’s eyes to choose such a trait, is it ethical to choose enhancements for specific traits the child also would not have a choice in? Even though we may be able to choose numerous different traits for our children, that does not mean we necessarily should. How do we know our child will want to be musically talented, faster, or have larger muscles than they would have had originally?

As we continued up the stairs of the library to stretch our muscles, the discussion transitioned to future regulation of genetic engineering. We discussed whether government would ever be able to control genetic enhancements once the technology has evolved enough to be a choice for future parents. As long as individuals are able to participate in medical tourism, any country’s regulation of genetic engineering would be ineffective.

Saturday, February 14, 2015

Jindal, antiabortion activists block Planned Parenthood in New Orleans


Jindal, antiabortion activists block Planned Parenthood in New Orleans



It seems to me that there is a serious abortion issue going on in New Orleans, Louisiana. This is what the Washington Post had to say about the issue:

                 "NEW ORLEANS — Planned Parenthood began construction here last year on a clinic that would perform abortions and provide other medical services for women. “High-Quality, Affordable Health Care for New Orleans,” a sign promised. “Seeing Patients Early 2015.”
That sign is now crumpled on the ground behind a chain-link fence at the project’s abandoned construction site, victim of efforts by Gov. Bobby Jindal (R) and other abortion opponents to block the clinic."

To read more on this issue, click the link below.

http://wapo.st/1vuqeIo


Friday, February 13, 2015

Bradley becomes Chelsea-"Be all that you can be," indeed

Posted for Ramsey Ferguson:
In a first for the Army, Chelsea Manning, the convicted national-security secrets leaker, has been approved for hormone therapy for transition to a woman at the Army's Fort Leavenworth prison, according to a memo obtained Thursday by USA TODAY.
Manning remains a soldier as well as an inmate.
"After carefully considering the recommendation that (hormone treatment) is medically appropriate and necessary, and weighing all associated safety and security risks presented, I approve adding (hormone treatment) to Inmate Manning's treatment plan," Col. Erica Nelson, the commandant of the Fort Leavenworth Disciplinary Barracks in Kansas, wrote in a Feb. 5 memo.
Formerly named Bradley Manning, the soldier was convicted of sending classified documents to anti-secrecy website WikiLeaks. Manning is serving a 35-year prison sentence and is eligible for parole in about seven years...

Paradox of Healthcare

Jason, Erica, Yvonne and I chose to work on the paradox of healthcare. We will discuss the American healthcare system, its capabilities and inconsistencies, and compare it to other healthcare systems outside the USA. We will further discuss which countries we will do a bit a research on to compare systems.

Thursday, February 12, 2015

Group 3

We will be doing our project on vaccinations.
Mason
Wesley
Andrew
Graham

Group Us

Catriona, Marissa, Crystal

Genetic Enhancements and the positives, negatives, and general

Presentation topics for Group 1

Group 1 will split into 2 groups and present about memory enhancement and athletic enhancement.

02/12/15 Quiz

Rest of questions added to Dr. Oliver's Quiz

7. What is the name of the first cloned cat? (AP 4)
Answer: Carbon Copy

8. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis is used for what? (AP 20)
Answer: sex determination

9. What two countries have a chilling sex ratio? (AP 22)
Answer: India and China
The case against perfection
Quiz questions chapter 1

1. What is one of the four examples of bioengineering already on the horizon? (P.10)
2. Who is Dr. H. Lee Sweeney? (P. 10)
3. The author said "Fairness is one of the primary reason to stop genetic enhancement in sport" (T/F) (p.12)
4.What do critics call the elective use of human growth hormones? (P.17)
5. What is MicroSort?(p.22)
6. What two countries have a chilling sex ratio  ? ( p.22)
7. What is one of the disadvantages, most scientists give about cloning? ( p. 6)

Discussion questions
Do you think that genetic engineering threaten human freedom and flourishing?
Do you think that bioengineering will create a big divide between the people who can afford it and the people who can't?

The Ethics of Enhancement

FQ1: What was cloned in 1997?
FQ2: What are the 4 major examples of bioengineering?
DQ1: Is it wromg to pick traits for your child and why?
DQ2: Does cloning violate the child's right to autonomy?