While euthanasia presents
many dilemmas to face there is also hope and potential solutions to many of
these issues. As far as the misdiagnosis aspect of euthanasia is concerned it
is possible to enact some form of advisory board of doctors, medical
specialists and judges. This panel would be able to view and analyze each case
to ensure that proper measures and tests had been run on the patient and that
announcements as far as expected time left were as close as possible. While
this may seem like a convoluted solution it seems like the safest way to ensure
that euthanasia was only being offered to those that truly qualified. The worse
thing that could happen would be people abusing euthanasia whether through
elder abuse, financial reasons or using the system as a way of suicide. Another
possible preventative measure to ensure the correct use of euthanasia would potentially
be using social workers to work closely with the family to ensure that the
patient was not being pressured into making a decision they were not
comfortable with. With these measures in place euthanasia can be a far safer
and more accessible option to those who wish to have access to it.
Yes, but serious attention must be given to how the "panel" is portrayed to the public. "Quality of Life Panel" is cumbersome, but connotes a better brand that Death Panel... if there's any way to avoid it.
ReplyDelete