Posted for Ramsey Ferguson
This post will focus primarily on the Anabolic Steroid Control Act of 1990. This is where
congress declared anabolic steroids a schedule III controlled substance. This puts steroids in
the same class as Vicodin, LSD precursors, and some veterinary tranquilizers. There is a
specified difference between charges on personal use and intent to distribute, but this can be
skewed sometimes because while many drugs are bought and sold in small amounts where it is
more easily determined whether there is intent to distribute or not, that is not the case with
steroids. Steroids are generally bought per cycle or per couple cycles. This means that an
individual could have massive amounts of steroids for personal use of one or a couple cycles
and it would be hard to differentiate between personal use and intent to sell.
Many medical professionals from the FDA, DEA, National Institute on Drug Abuse, and
even the American Medical Association were called on to speak at the congressional hearings
leading up to the Steroid Control Act of 1990. Their evidence and arguments were disregarded
when congress didn’t hear what they wanted to hear. These professionals didn’t agree with
anabolic steroids being classified this way based on medical evidence, statistics, and personal
accounts, but the scare of steroids was enough to override the evidence presented to them.
That doesn’t make much sense, but time and time again throughout the semester we
have looked at examples of how what people don’t understand scares them, and often times
they are too stubborn to look at the facts that lay before them and see that some claims don’t
match reality.
The studies done on anabolic steroids seem to point towards the same conclusion that the
mental risks are greater than the physical risks when taking steroids. There have been several
cases where a person committed suicide after taking steroids, but that makes me wonder if the
underlying depression or causes of suicide where there prior to taking the steroids. Maybe
those psychological issues led to them being unhappy and taking steroids because they
believed that an enhanced physique would bring them happiness? That is purely speculation,
but does seem viable.
https://thinksteroids.com/articles/anabolic-steroid-control-act-wrong-prescription/
http://www.steroidabuse.com/legal-ramifications-of-steroid-abuse.html
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15248788
Hard to improve on J.S. Mill's "harm principle" when pndering such cases.
ReplyDelete